Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

On a Mac, there is a which has many functions like: ordinary graphing, polar graphing, lin-log and log-log graphing, 3d graphing, derivatives, integrals, implicitly defined functions, equation solvers and much much more.

Is there anything similar (and preferably cheap/free) on Windows? I've seen many ordinary "graphing calculator" apps that can't do much more than graphing an ordinary function like y=3x^2.

I especially need the implicitly defined function grapher so I can graph 4y^2-5*e^(-2x)-x*y=4?

I've tried Wolfram Alpha, but I need to see more than the limited window it gives me.

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

After a little searching I found the free Microsoft Mathematics which does a lot of the stuff I was looking for.

With the Mathematics 4.0 free download, you get a full-featured graphing calculator with a formulas and equations library, a triangle solver, a unit conversion tool, ink handwriting support, and more.

share|improve this answer

Winplot is the best free graphing software for Windows that I'm aware of: Winplot. Indeed, I came to this question because I'm looking for something for a Mac that will do as much as Winplot does (Grapher has some things it does better, but other things Winplot does and Grapher doesn't do).

share|improve this answer

There's the Graphing Calculator that came with Macs before Grapher was introduced (in 10.3). It's sorta expensive (at $100) but really easy to use and powerful.

share|improve this answer
that is pretty expensive. After a little searching I found the free Microsoft Mathematics which does a lot of the stuff I was looking for. But thanks for the suggestion. – Albert Armea May 26 '11 at 21:50
@Albert You should put that (the Microsoft Mathematics) as an answer, and maybe accept it (though I appreciate the points), as not everybody reads the comments. – CajunLuke May 26 '11 at 22:19
@Albert I second that, please use this system, it helps people find the answer more quickly. @CajunLuke I'd still give you +1 if you mind the points :) – slhck May 26 '11 at 22:31
and @slhck, I didn't know I could answer my own questions. Thanks for letting me know. – Albert Armea May 28 '11 at 21:20

In case anyone stumbles across this question, like I did:

Try Graph by Ivan Johansen. You can find the newest version (as well as the source code) at

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

protected by Community Jun 25 '14 at 12:44

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .