up vote 15 down vote favorite
share [g+] share [fb]

I know USB 3.0 is almost entirely backward-compatible, and I know that it introduces a new speed that USB 2.0 devices aren't capable of, but is there any advantage to having a USB 2.0 device in a USB 3.0 port?

Though I'm interested in if it would provide any benefit for any device, I was specifically thinking of a USB Hub that I plug my Bluetooth receiver and flash-drives into.

link|improve this question
3  
No. The USB device that you are using cannot go faster. – soandos Jun 5 '11 at 16:06
feedback

4 Answers

up vote 18 down vote accepted

Since your USB is optimized for USB 2.0, using a 3.0 will see no improvement because it simply cannot operate at 3.0 speeds.

USB 2.0 has a maximum speed of 60 MB/s USB 3.0 has a maximum speed of 625MB/sec

From Wikipedia's Article on the Universal Serial Bus:

Typical hi-speed USB hard drives can be written to at rates around 25–30 MB/s, and read from at rates of 30–42 MB/s, according to routine testing done by CNet.[62] This is 70% of the total bandwidth available.

Based on this, you can see that USB 2.0 devices just are not capable of the speeds 3.0 has to offer.

TL;DR version: You will see no benefits

link|improve this answer
2  
That quote is unrelated to the question; it's about USB-hard-drives specifically, and is saying that even USB 3.0 hard-drives won't benefit from plugging into a USB 3.0 port, because they don't saturate the available USB 2.0 bandwidth as it is. There could very well be devices (such as flash drives) which could otherwise operate at USB 3.0 speeds, but can't simply because they are not USB 3.0-compatible. – BlueRaja Jun 5 '11 at 22:09
2  
@BlueRaja it was meant to be taken as an example. – Simon Sheehan Jun 5 '11 at 22:41
2  
+1 for the TL;DR version. Though I had already read the whole answer :/ – Gani Simsek Jun 6 '11 at 9:38
feedback
up vote 9 down vote

One advantage could be that USB 3.0 can supply more power than USB 2.0.

I have some doubt whether an USB 2.0 device could use that power, as it would be designed for a USB 2.0 port. On the other hand many USB 2.0 devices exceed the specified power and get away with it (mostly external disks when they start up).

link|improve this answer
Some USB 2 devices have problems when connected via a hub. Would be interesting to know if they have fewer problems if the hub is plugged into a USB 3 socket with its higher power rating. – pelms Jun 5 '11 at 22:53
I'm gonna open this question back up and hope someone has any definite answer about this. – Nich Del Jun 5 '11 at 23:49
feedback
up vote 7 down vote

None, other than it will work. You gain no performance unless using USB 3.0 devices.

link|improve this answer
feedback
up vote 4 down vote

At least on my computer, the 3.0 port is faster than the 2.0 port. However, that is because it is on a different controller, which is faster than the one built into the chipset.

Basically, if the usb 3.0 is from the same controller as the usb 2.0 port, it's going to be the same. Otherwise, YMMV.

link|improve this answer
This is the only right answer. USB3 hardware tends to be more sophisticated than USB2 (faster microcontrollers, more cache memory, faster PCIe interface) and this might translate to benefits for high-speed devices. – Ben Voigt Oct 9 '11 at 19:21
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown
discard

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.