Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I notice no marketing mentions MIPs, and its not mentioned in specifications for processors.

How reliable is this statistic? By now we all know more Mhz and Ghz is not necessarily a good direct comparison

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

They're not good. Modern architecture makes MIPS an antiquated measurement. If you're looking to programmatically determine the speed of the running system, it might give you a ballpark on the generation of the machine, but the best measure if you're shopping for a machine are the big benchmarking sites. e.g. http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

There's a article on Wikipedia that discusses some of the weaknesses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second

share|improve this answer

It depends what you want to measure but in general it's not a practical real world measurement for general bechmarking and it's hard to compare across different architectures - for example, my processor might be fantastic at executing a NOP (no-operation) instruction in a loop, but it might be crap at shift operations or my SIMD microcode may be sub-par and thus no good for heavy graphics, digital signal processing or encryption/decryption.

MIPS is a bit like comparing the performance of a group of cars and vans by putting them all in neutral and revving the engines to max and concluding that the Porche must be best - only to find that the group test is to pick a vehicle for carrying freight.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .