Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I notice no marketing mentions MIPs, and its not mentioned in specifications for processors.

How reliable is this statistic? By now we all know more Mhz and Ghz is not necessarily a good direct comparison

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

They're not good. Modern architecture makes MIPS an antiquated measurement. If you're looking to programmatically determine the speed of the running system, it might give you a ballpark on the generation of the machine, but the best measure if you're shopping for a machine are the big benchmarking sites. e.g.

There's a article on Wikipedia that discusses some of the weaknesses:

share|improve this answer

It depends what you want to measure but in general it's not a practical real world measurement for general bechmarking and it's hard to compare across different architectures - for example, my processor might be fantastic at executing a NOP (no-operation) instruction in a loop, but it might be crap at shift operations or my SIMD microcode may be sub-par and thus no good for heavy graphics, digital signal processing or encryption/decryption.

MIPS is a bit like comparing the performance of a group of cars and vans by putting them all in neutral and revving the engines to max and concluding that the Porche must be best - only to find that the group test is to pick a vehicle for carrying freight.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.