Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have 2 desktops at the office. I use the main one in dual monitor mode and I tend to max out its meager reasources between web browsers (for code testing) a music or other media player and all of my developer tools. I want to be able to use the second machine for non-developement tasks but I do not want to have to toggle my monitor back and forth and/or switch keyboards and mice to do that.

What is the lightest weight (on the main machine) solution for controlling 2 machines from the same monitor(s)?

Both machines are WinXP sp3.

Edit

I'd like to go with a software solution that allows me to manipulate both machines more or less simultaneously. Changing my focus from the screen to a KVM to switch back and forth just to change music tracks might be more hassle than it saves in resources.

Of the various VNS client/servers and Windows's own Remote Desktop, which uses the least overhead?

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 5 down vote accepted

This doesn't answer your exact question, but if you had an additional monitor for your other computer, you could use Synergy-plus to control both systems with a single keyboard and mouse. It will also synchronize the clipboards between systems.

It is a lot more usable than keeping a remote desktop session open, but of course, it does require an additional monitor.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 I have been using Synergy forever, didn't know about "plus", but it easily the best soultion, I used KVM and if you check out the screen shot on the link, that is exactly how my setup looks. I use dual monitors for one computer and a single monitor for the second computer. You can't beat the clipboard functionality either. You can't go wrong with this solution, fork out $100 bucks for the additional monitor –  Breadtruck Aug 26 '09 at 14:20
    
Wow, this looks great. I remember looking into synergy a few years ago, and it seemed too young and hard to configure at the time, but this looks much more mature. I will definitely check this out! –  pkaeding Aug 26 '09 at 14:49
1  
I didn't mention it because of the single monitor requirement, but I use it myself at work and it is brilliant. 4 Desktops, 2 Machines. One running Vista and another running 7. –  Diago Aug 26 '09 at 15:45

When you mean 'toggle' your monitor - your not excluding a KVM Switch are you?

A KVM Switch is the lightest weight solution as it is a hardware only soltuion. Note that a KVM is only going to be practical if the secondary machine is physically close to your primary machine as cables from the switch need to be run.

A Remote Desktop solution, as mentioned in other answers has no limitations on physical machine location, although being on the LAN would be preferred for performance reasons. For this case, I would go with Windows Remote Desktop. It's free, built into Windows, and I've never ever had an issue with it. I use it for all of my remote system administration within my office and at home.

share|improve this answer
1  
Remote Desktop is much easier and more convenient than a KVM switch. At least it is in my experience. –  firedfly Aug 26 '09 at 13:36
3  
My experience is the exact opposite. KVM switches are much easier and more convenient than Remote Desktop. To each his own... –  CoverosGene Aug 26 '09 at 13:46
1  
If he is maxing out "meager" resources on his primary machine, he will be using up even more on that machine by running remote desktop. A KVM would have zero bearing on performance. –  Matthew Ruston Aug 26 '09 at 13:49
1  
I've done both, KVM and Remote Desktop and I tend to prefer the KVM if possible, but Remote Desktop if I don't have a KVM. –  Hondalex Aug 26 '09 at 13:50
1  
On the other hand Remote Desktop is sllooooowww in comparison to KVM, even on our local 100 MBit network. –  Adrian Grigore Aug 26 '09 at 20:27

VNC or Remote Desktop. Minimize/close it when you don't need the second PC.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 for Remote Desktop –  firedfly Aug 26 '09 at 13:37
    
as they are both windows, remote desktop would be the easiest/fastest/best solution imo –  Mike M Aug 26 '09 at 13:45

I bought a cheap DVI switch from Amazon for about 11 EUR. It's not a full-blown KVM, but if you are only looking for a way to switch monitor signals that's probably the cheapest solution. Despite some negative reviews at amazon, it does work well on my system. No problems with playback of Blu-Ray DVDs either. And it's not as slow and sluggish as RemoteDesktop.

Edit: Combine this with Synergy-plus as Dlux suggested and you should be done.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.