Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I seen many applications (such as warcraft) dump images as TGA. Why?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by slhck, Linker3000, studiohack Aug 1 '11 at 1:07

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I'd say historic reasons -- TGA has always been used for textures in game engines, so that's why it seems like an easy choice to use the same format for saving (without an additional need for JPEG/PNG libraries). I don't see the real problem or question though, and I also guess you'd need a Blizzard developer to tell you the real* reason. Therefore voting to close as not constructive. – slhck Jul 2 '11 at 21:25
up vote 6 down vote accepted

TGA or Targa image file format was one of the most ubiquitous and relatively early formats that supported alpha transparency and generally was used by the games industry for sprite data. In addition it also supported RLE (run-length encoding), which is very simple way of compacting repetitive data and can be useful for some sprite data.

The file format specification was fairly linear and also importantly wasn't encumbered by patents, so this format is trusted for its ease of implementation, features and lack of legal issues associated with software patents.

share|improve this answer
I always assumed it was patented (since i saw on wiki that it was owned by a company) – acidzombie24 Jul 3 '11 at 6:13
Thankfully not, it's the format that got away! That said, there were probably many other formats that would have been considered prior art. Such things are ignored in today's patent-happy climate. – Ruairi Fullam Jul 3 '11 at 18:28

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.