Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Should I run an antivirus in a publicly-facing Windows Server?

If so, which one would be the best for that situation?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Tog, Kevin Panko, Dave, Mokubai, kobaltz Apr 30 at 14:11

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Tog, Kevin Panko, Dave, Mokubai
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
serverfault.com/questions/2899/… –  warren Sep 20 '09 at 15:14

3 Answers 3

up vote 10 down vote accepted

If it's connected to any machines that may be connected to the Internet, then absolutely yes.

There're many options available. While I personally don't like McAfee or Norton, they are out there. There's also AVG, F-Secure, ClamAV (though the win32 port is no longer active), and I'm sure hundreds more :)

Microsoft has even been working on one - I don't know if it's available yet outside of beta, but it does exist.

ClamWin, mentioned by @J Pablo.

ESET NOD32 Antivirus Business Edition, from http://serverfault.com/questions/2899/what-anti-virus-for-windows-server

share|improve this answer
    
There's a ClamWin which is based on ClamAV and it runs on Windows. –  Pablo Sep 1 '09 at 5:55
    
Sorry, but I disagree. The only reason to install antivirus on a server is if it's a file server. Antivirus software just has too much impact on CPU and disk performance. –  Nicholas Sep 1 '09 at 7:59
1  
impact on CPU and disk performance? I've not seen more than a couple percent impact, personally - and with any Windows system connected to the world (like, say, a school mail or wev server), it's a Good Idea(tm). If it's merely a file server, and nothing's running there, then you could theoretically offload the scanning to desktops. However, for a single-digit percentage performance hit, I'll run the AV on the server :) –  warren Sep 1 '09 at 8:09

which one would be the best for that situation?

i'm using A-squared CommandLine Scanner for that.

create various batch files for certain scenarios (e.g. update, scan the entire system, scan user folders only, etc.) to be scheduled in various intervals.

it's free (for personal use), extremely fast, scans for viruses AND spyware, handles archives, low foot print and A2 excels with a very high detection rate.

share|improve this answer

If you handle files and programs on the server from unsecured locations, definately yes. Try www.avast.com. They have pretty good antivirus solutions for servers with a minimum footprint on your resources...

share|improve this answer
    
it doesn't support server OS :-( maybe it used to but not on Server 2012 –  Simon Oct 30 at 23:36

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.