I have 4 GB of RAM and would like to make use of ReadyBoost to speed up hard drive access, by taking advantage of its hard drive cache method.

However, as I understand the technology, ReadyBoost focus is reducing RAM usage, instead of increasing hard drive access times. That is, before anything gets sent to RAM, if it can be stored in the ReadyBoost enabled pen drive, it will.

For a 4GB system that doesn't do much memory paging between RAM and the hard drive, isn't this going to actually make my system run slower since reading access times on a USB flash drive, while faster than on a hard drive, is still much slower than on RAM?

Or, in other words, does ReadyBoost slow down systems with more RAM than what they usually require?

link|improve this question
Thank you all for your responses. – Paula Ferreira Jul 23 '11 at 16:34
ReadyBoost won't slow down your system. The precache is loaded earlier whether you use the apps or not. But boot time gets longer with every increase of RAM since there is more that can be loaded from disk. – Abraxas Jul 23 '11 at 17:12
feedback

2 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

I don't know that I agree with the statement: "ReadyBoost focus is reducing RAM usage, instead of increasing hard drive access times."

It is primarily used for caching files, so they do not have to be read from the hard disk again, which is slower. Unless you have an SSD drive, I believe you would probably notice the difference. I saw a big difference, especially with things associated with the Interface.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReadyBoost

link|improve this answer
feedback

No. ReadyBoost is only used when the RAM is full and some memory content would be written to the page file.

link|improve this answer
6  
Absolutely incorrect. ReadyBoost uses the superfetch cache to preload frequently used applications. It has nothing to do with page file usage, and it would actually be expected to improve systems with more RAM even more since more of the memory could be preloaded. It it not RAM, does not act like RAM, is not a substitute for RAM, and it's use is completely independent of RAM or page file use. – Abraxas Jul 23 '11 at 17:09
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.