Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Are tape archives still used?

Possible Duplicate:
What lasts longer: Data stored on non-volatile flash RAM, optical media, or magnetic disk?

A lot of the backups done at my work are done to tape. Frankly, I was surprised tape was still being used in a production environment, where the hard disk rules the storage market. This got me wondering WHY people are still using tape for things like backups.

Is it because of the cost? I would imagine that they cost more than hard disks due to there being a lower demand. Are they better/easier to store?

Or is it just because they don't want to upgrade to a newer technology?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by random Jul 25 '11 at 19:22

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Cheap one-line answer: Because they're more reliable and store huge loads of data at a very low cost. Properly stored tapes last for ages. – slhck Jul 25 '11 at 19:15
How the hell is this a duplicate of the two others? I have stated in my question that YES I know tape archives are still used (also, the answers to that question do NOT give me a full one to mine) and longevity is only part of my question. – n0pe Jul 25 '11 at 20:38
up vote 6 down vote accepted

One reason and one reason only: longevity.

Hard disks and solid state drives do not have a long lifespan as compared to conventional tape-storage media. I cover some of the reasons why SSDs and HDDs wear down over time here, but the basic idea is that with tape backups, there is next to no data corruption over time, and an extremely low chance of mechanical failure. Even if the tape did happen to run off the spool, it would be much easier (and less risky) to move the tape to a new "cassette" - the same cannot be said for replacing HDD platters, which is not a task for the faint at heart.

Do note that the tapes themselves have a limited number of writes, so they are also not written to as frequently as hard drives. Finally, tapes are used primarily for archiving purposes only - they are usually written to once, and then kept in a climate-controlled storage facility until they are (ever) needed. For this purpose, tapes are great - they are light, cheap, and easy to replace.

share|improve this answer
Nice answer, thanks +1 – n0pe Jul 25 '11 at 19:17
@MaxMackie They also offer great redundancy. Usually you have many copies of most of the data, with only a little changing. I went to a new customer one time, only to find that they had lost everything and that 6/10 tapes had failed. – KCotreau Jul 25 '11 at 19:25

Tape is not as sensitive to drops, bumps, or handling-cause issues that plague hard drives. They also offer a relatively low cost per gigabyte, compact size, and decently high speed. Hard drives, because they constructed of glass or ceramic disks and many movable parts, in addition to expected data degradation over time, are simply not up to the task of archival storage.

That said, most enterprises use multiple levels of backup, including both various arrays of hard disks working in combination with tape backups.

Hard disks offer fast backup and recovery as well as easy single-file restores. Tapes offer long-term archival storage, ease of off-site transfer and storage, large capacity, and small size.

Their differences do not point to a general winner overall, but each have their strengths and make them appropriate for specific purposes and strategies.

In my office we have incremental backup over WAN for easy and fast, single-file and point-in-time restores at user request, and tapes that are shipped off-site on a rotating schedule based on nightly backups.

share|improve this answer
Hard drives platters are far more commonly made from aluminum alloy rather than glass or ceramic. – sawdust Jul 25 '11 at 19:30
But ceramic and glass are becoming the new defaults due to better heat behavior. I'm surprised aluminum was ever used due to it's tendency to warp due to heat. But I suppose they found alloys that improved it's behavior in this respect. The only drives I've ever opened have all been glass/ceramic, going back 10 years. – music2myear Jul 25 '11 at 19:45

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .