Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There has been some speculation that Apple's Snow Leopard would finally include a version of Java 6 that works on 32-bit Intel hardware. Now that the OS has been released, can anybody confirm whether or not this is the case?

If anybody here has installed Snow Leopard on a 32-bit machine, could you please run the following command and report the output?

java -version

share|improve this question

migrated from stackoverflow.com Aug 28 '09 at 18:28

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

    
Thanks BTW. Learned something new tonight regarding the Java version command. – BinaryMisfit Aug 28 '09 at 19:20
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I have a 32-bit only Mac and did a fresh install of Snow Leopard. It is an original black MacBook (model 1,1).

Here is the output for 'java -version' which would be the default java version (as of initial Snow Leopard launch, 10.6.0):

java version "1.6.0_15"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_15-b03-219)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 14.1-b02-90, mixed mode)

Update: As of today, OS X 10.6.4 we have:

$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_20"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02-279-10M3065)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 16.3-b01-279, mixed mode)
share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for. – Dan Dyer Aug 29 '09 at 11:42
    
Weird thing: I just updated one of my machines to 10.6.4 (directly from 10.6.0) and the java version is 10.6.0_15. Strange... – Dan Rosenstark Oct 5 '10 at 19:16

I installed this morning. Looking in "Java Preferences", this is the info I have:

Java SE 6 64 bit

Java SE 6 32 bit

My machine is a 64 bit, but if the 32 bit version is available to me, I don't see why they would not make it available to people using 32 bit machines.

share|improve this answer
    
@Pinochle Thanks, looks promising. – Dan Dyer Aug 28 '09 at 21:10

I came across this link.

I needed Java 1.5 for legacy app.

I've follow the instructions there and now I'm able to choose from:

alt text

The directory end up looking like this:

alt text

I not sure how trustworthy the JDK I've downloaded is, though. :(

share|improve this answer
    
Makes me wonder if an archived Leopard Java 5 (like one from a Time Machine backup) wouldn't work as well. Apple removed it from Snow Leopard for some unknown reason... – Arjan Sep 4 '09 at 18:57
    
Probably they just didn't feel like supporting it. :( – OscarRyz Sep 4 '09 at 19:26

These versions are provided in the JavaVM Framework:

1.3.1 (1.3)

1.6.0 (1.5, 1.5.0, 1.6)

share|improve this answer
    
What does "About this Mac" report about your processor? – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen Aug 28 '09 at 18:56
    
@Nerdling: Thanks, are you on a 32-bit machine? If so, would you be kind enough to run the "java -version" command to verify that the 1.6 version actually runs on 32-bit hardware? – Dan Dyer Aug 28 '09 at 19:36
    
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM – Nerdling Aug 31 '09 at 13:08

I noticed as Cyberduck has some trouble, but indeed, on a first generation MacBook, 32 bit, Snow Leopard:

cd /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/

total 48
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    5 Aug 29 11:24 1.3 -> 1.3.1
drwxr-xr-x  3 root  wheel  102 Jul 21 01:35 1.3.1
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   10 Aug 29 11:24 1.5 -> CurrentJDK
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   10 Aug 29 11:24 1.5.0 -> CurrentJDK
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    5 Aug 29 11:24 1.6 -> 1.6.0
drwxr-xr-x  8 root  wheel  272 Aug 29 11:55 1.6.0
drwxr-xr-x  9 root  wheel  306 Aug 29 11:55 A
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    1 Aug 29 11:24 Current -> A
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    3 Aug 29 11:24 CurrentJDK -> 1.6

(Not sure if I like SL deleting my previous Java SDKs, but well, it removed my printers as well...)

share|improve this answer

If you can't update to Snow Leopard for any reason you can always use this fix to get 1.6.0 working on your 32-bit macbook... works pretty good for me. I'll upgrade to Snow Leopard once I have time to make a safe backup of HD

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, I already have SoyLatte, but it's not the same. It doesn't integrate with the native OS X desktop, it requires X11. – Dan Dyer Oct 1 '09 at 23:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .