Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a DSL now, and am switching to Cable modem because in my neighborhood DSL is capped at 1.5 mbps which I can no longer tolerate.

Now I have a combo DSL Modem/Wireless device. For the cable modem I am pondering whether to separate the modem from the wireless. This would give me some flexibility in upgrading each unit separately as needed.

On the other hand, I've been OK with the setup I have for 6 years and would rather not spend too much time messing with it, so a one-unit solution might be better.

What do other people have now? Any preference over one unit versus a modem and separate wireless router? Any suggestions on brand and model? I am in Boulder, CO and am getting Comcast internet.

share|improve this question

migrated from Jul 26 '11 at 16:56

This question came from our site for system and network administrators.

closed as not constructive by Shinrai, Sathya Jul 26 '11 at 17:20

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

You should be aware that DSL and cable have the same capping limits. Both have shared bandwidth at the trunk from their terminating equipment (DSLAM for DSL and CMTS for cable), but the ports are managed for speeds for the individual circuits off that trunk. What is probably happening is your distance from the CO is too great that you are unable to sync at a higher rate than 1.5. Your DSL company may be able to offer you VDSL as an option, which would significantly increase the speed of your circuit. If you are going to separate devices, make sure Comcast bridges the modem to avoid double NAT. – MaQleod Aug 17 '11 at 18:01
up vote 2 down vote accepted

There is nothing really terrible about either approach. For the sake of modularity, I always prefer to keep my router separate from my modem so that each piece of equipment is serving a specific purpose. Even in the cases where my ISP provides me with a modem that has all-in-one features, I typically will disable them all and set up the modem to function in a DMZ or passthrough mode to route all traffic to my router. With your own router, not only can you upgrade or switch easily if something should break, you can also use your own firmware like DD-WRT to provide additional functionality that you may not find in stock ROMs. As far as router brands go, I prefer Cisco/Linksys models of routers as they've always worked well for me and provided good reliability.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .