Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I heard that flash memory cards are better than flash drives for this and they are also small things that fit into flash reader slot in laptop that don't stick and hang so you would be able to carry your operating system easily if needed.

Question is, will a 32GB flash memory card be enough to run Windows 7? At least it will cost less than SSD.

share|improve this question
    
Curious. My prediction is you'll lose more time working out incompatibilities than time saved. But it is an interesting exercise. –  surfasb Aug 16 '11 at 7:20
    
What incompatibilities are you talking about? –  Boris_yo Aug 16 '11 at 7:25

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You can definitely install Windows to an SD card, but the speed issue is iffy.

SD cards, in general, are actually incredibly slow. Hard disks write at around 70-90MB/s. The Class number on an SD card? that's the minimum sustained write speed in MB/s, while the card will typically achieve a little higher. So, a Class 8 SD card (that's a nice one) is probably around 20% the write speed of a computer hard disk.

But wait... I thought solid state was supposed to be faster!

Well, depends on how you measure it. That SD card features instantaneous seeking, meaning that while your hard disk has to send metal arms panning back and forth to physically look for data, the SD card can just instantly retrieve any given address. This makes repetitive, small operations much faster, and it's why SSDs are so exciting.

So, to sum it up, an SD card has an instantaneous seek, but a slow overall transfer speed. In terms of user experience, this will be both a gain and a loss. General computer usage will actually be a bit faster, because it consists of a lot of small operations. Large operations will be much slower, though. For example, I'd expect hibernating and resuming to take longer, possibly quite significantly longer. Booting will likely also slow down. Large programs might take just a bit longer to launch.

The real trouble is that SD cards are built to be small, physically durable, and cheap. Not to be fast. This means that they have relatively low-end flash storage in them. A solid-state drive is capable of at competing with a hard disk for practical speed (solidly beating in many cases), but only at a much higher price because of the higher-grade flash storage necessary to achieve comparable speeds.

SD vs. SSD? SSD wins easily.

SD vs. USB? I believe good USB drives are usually somewhat faster, because of the less restrictive physical format.

Additionally, SD cards are much less durable to write-cycles than hard disks, meaning that an SD card serving an operating system may fail very quickly due to the very large number of write cycles incurred. To minimize this, be sure to disable the page file, indexing service, and anything else you can think of that causes a lot of background writes.

share|improve this answer
    
Awesome answer. I think I better use SD card for ReadyBoost. –  Boris_yo Aug 16 '11 at 8:09

It will be enough in so far as that it meets the minimum requirement for Windows 7:

16 GB available hard disk space (32-bit) or 20 GB (64-bit)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.