Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Windows 7 (x64) there are occasions when I'm running some sort of CPU intensive process like applying filters in Photoshop, etc that take several minutes to run. If I look in the resource monitor I don't see much CPU usage, perhaps 5-10% per core, a few gigs of free RAM, and little disk usage. Obviously the computer is doing work, my question is why isn't that reflected in the stats?

share|improve this question

migrated from Aug 21 '11 at 8:46

This question came from our site for system and network administrators.

Do you have a cuda supported GPU ? – Lucas Kauffman Aug 21 '11 at 7:19

If the task is not multi-threaded then it will "bounce" between cores but it will only be able to actually use 1 core at a time. You will likely see that the process itself uses about 25% CPU time on a 4-core processor (i.e. 1 processor fully in use) or about 12.5% CPU time on an 8-core processor.

Showing this kind of CPU usage per-core distorts this CPU usage somewhat as (as I mentioned) the process is does not necessarily always stick to the same core.

5-10% per core (call it 7.5% average) * 4 = 30% overall cpu usage

Which is what I'd expect to see for a quad-core system running one heavy single threaded task along with some background system tasks.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.