Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have an application where a user can download a PDF for printing.

I want to be able to resrict the number of copies that can be printed.

Is it possible to digitally sign/restrict a PDF in this way?

Regards

share|improve this question

migrated from stackoverflow.com Aug 21 '11 at 13:44

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

    
What would stop your users from simply putting those "limited copies" in their copying machine? –  grapefrukt Dec 11 '08 at 9:31
    
Nothing of course, although for some content this is against the law. –  Drew Gibson Dec 11 '08 at 9:46

5 Answers 5

Yes but you will need to use PDF DRM.

Most would consider DRM is a bad thing, and it is breakable.

You will probably have to pay a company to use their DRM software.

Click here

share|improve this answer

Basically, no. That would mean that you have to write somewhere the information of how many times the PDF has been printed. All that would be required to print it more time would be to make a copy of the file before printing, and print the copy. The original would still have the information that it is not printed.

Worst case, it is always possible to print it once and make xerox copies after, so you dont gain much by being able to restrict the number of prints.

share|improve this answer
    
This is incorrect, the number of printings can be restricted and this is commonly used, e.g. for academic paper PDF's where the person downloading will only be able to print a copy once. –  Drew Gibson Dec 11 '08 at 9:44
    
It is easy to come up with the idea of giving the PDF a unique identify (an embedded GUID, encrypted or otherwise hidden so it's hard to change, I guess), and then putting the print-counter on a remote server. So it doesn't have to be in the file itself. –  unwind Dec 11 '08 at 9:56

I agree that DRM can be cracked and worked around but it is a customer requirement. I don't have technically savy the end user will be.

Thanks for the link. I will take a look.

share|improve this answer

Why impose arbitrary limitations on something you can easily copy as much as you like with other means?

Your customers won't be happy.

share|improve this answer
    
For some content, it against the law to make a xerox copy. This doesn't stop you doing it of course. When you are in that situation it's up to you whether you don't mind getting fired if you get caught. –  Drew Gibson Dec 11 '08 at 9:49

I want to be able to resrict the number of copies that can be printed.

The legal solution of copyright law is probably more appropriate than a technological one which may be questionable and/or annoying to customers.

IEEE has a solution they use for their technical library documents, namely they are now merging the original document with a footer saying "Permission to use this document granted to _@____.com" before serving it to everyone -- it doesn't stop someone from printing out the file or copying the file, but it does put the reader's name on the document so that if someone does print out 50,000 copies it will have their name on it & hence make legal enforcement of copyright law a little easier.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.