Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I tested a network issue and I just started using Linux on my netbook (works great!). It seems that there shouldn't be any difference in sending ICMP packets, but I want to be sure about this.

Is there any significant difference between Linux and Windows ping (except the default packet size)?

share|improve this question

There should be little difference at the network layer. They do behave differently. The Linux ping does not terminate by default. You have to interrupt it (Ctrl-C) to end it and get a summary report.

The Linux ping also has many more diagnostic features.

share|improve this answer
1  
1  
At least on Windows XP, the sequence number field was incorrectly written in host byte order rather than in network byte order, so the sequence numbers looked funny when viewed by a program that displayed them in network byte order. – garyjohn Aug 25 '11 at 6:59
    
@garyjohn: Ah, that must be why Wireshark displays it in both orders at the same time :/ – grawity Aug 25 '11 at 7:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .