Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I tested a network issue and I just started using Linux on my netbook (works great!). It seems that there shouldn't be any difference in sending ICMP packets, but I want to be sure about this.

Is there any significant difference between Linux and Windows ping (except the default packet size)?

share|improve this question

There should be little difference at the network layer. They do behave differently. The Linux ping does not terminate by default. You have to interrupt it (Ctrl-C) to end it and get a summary report.

The Linux ping also has many more diagnostic features.

share|improve this answer
At least on Windows XP, the sequence number field was incorrectly written in host byte order rather than in network byte order, so the sequence numbers looked funny when viewed by a program that displayed them in network byte order. – garyjohn Aug 25 '11 at 6:59
@garyjohn: Ah, that must be why Wireshark displays it in both orders at the same time :/ – grawity Aug 25 '11 at 7:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .