Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a private linux box (Ubuntu 10.04) which is running various applications, many of which I access remotely using local forwarding. Now I would like to provide access to a third party, however I don't want to give him any more than LocalForward access to specific ports.

He doesn't need any shell or scp/sftp access, so I'd prefer to restrict him from those entirely if possible. If he needs a shell for localforward, then I'm happy to concede that, but if so I'd prefer to jail him in his home area. I'm happy with the jailing part if need be, plenty of guides online as far as I can tell, unless there is something special relating to my case I should be aware of.


share|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.