Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Most window-managers copy the ideas of windows and MacOSX these days. But some have innovative ideas, that make the life much easier and the work faster done.

I used long time Fluxbox - it was the first wm I learned to know, that allow me to configure keys and have control about the sizing of applications. Putting windows in a window-group and let them share the same titlebar makes the tab-feature of some applications unneeded - tabbing in the WM is the far better solution.

Recently I dropped Fluxbox - because I tried the awesome-wm. That makes life even better with this tag-concept. I can run applications in fullscreen without borders and without title-bar, that saves much space on the screen (good for my 8-inch-netbook-screen). I can tile the windows if needed and group tags together as I wish. I don't think I even use all features of awesome yet.

I want to know, what window-managers do you know with cool innovative features, that might change the world (at least the world of superusers).

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If you like the idea of a tiling window manager you should definitely check out dwm. I found the configuration to be far less daunting than that of awesome-wm (though you do have to recompile after a reconfiguration). Here are some of my favorite features:

  • The ability to start programs with a certain tag is what really did it for me (not sure if this feature is also available in awesome).
  • Being able to pipe conky into dwm and have it displayed in the status bar is quite useful as well.
  • Being able to map hotkeys without the need for any external program running in the background.
  • Functionality can be extended through the use of patches provided by the community.
  • Dmenu means you'll never need to take your hands off the keyboard again.
share|improve this answer
    
Tags, configurable hotkeys and starting applications with the keyboard are all features of awesome. I could be wrong, but wasn't awesome a fork of dwm? –  Mnementh Aug 31 '09 at 19:57
1  
No; while they are similar dwm takes a more minimalistic approach using only a single C header file for configuration that is then compiled into the application itself instead of interpreting Lua configuration files (as in awesome). Its really just a matter of taste I suppose if you're not worried about the extra dependencies. –  Richard Marquez Aug 31 '09 at 20:51
    
+1 for dwm. It's a bit of a pain to set up if you want to use it inside a gnome session, but still the most comfortable WM i've used. –  Babu Aug 31 '09 at 21:29
add comment

If you're looking for X window managers, this is a good place to start.

share|improve this answer
    
Also check out xwinman. It's also got a nice page of historical window managers for those with more specialized tastes. –  new123456 Oct 28 '11 at 11:22
add comment

If you want heavily customized window-manager, try fvwm. You can even use perl to do scripting in the rc file.

share|improve this answer
    
I agree with CyberSnoopy fvwm is by far the most customizable window manager!! –  Warnaud Oct 27 '10 at 7:12
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.