Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to determine the bandwidth usage of XCOPY when copying files between two remote servers.

I am on an XP workstation running a batch file (over a WLAN) which uses XCOPY to copy files from \\server1 to \\server2.

When this copy is run how much file data is actually going through the workstation? Is the workstation actually reading and copying all of files between servers or is the actually copying of the files being handled at the network layer between the servers themselves?

Does Robocopy work the same way?

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Data is transferred through your computer, by reading chunks from the source and writing them to destination. Remote-remote copy is a relatively rare operation and not worth the implementation complexity.

  • Reachability: if client can reach both servers, it doesn't mean server A can reach server B directly.
  • Compatibility: In Windows, UNC paths can point to SMB, WebDAV, old NetWare, and possibily other protocols. If both server connections use different protocols or variants, a direct connection can be complicated if not impossible.
  • Security: Extending a file transfer protocol to add commands to establish connections to third-party servers can introduce security holes. See the FXP extension to FTP, and why no one uses it.
  • Authentication: Server A does not have your credentials for server B. In typical SMB, the password is never transmitted in plain text, and what is transmitted cannot be sent further (delegation is only possible with Kerberos, which needs Active Directory or equivalent). And that's assuming both servers accept the same set of credentials... And having server A ask you for server B's password would be a Bad Thing.

Both XCOPY and Robocopy work the same way, since neither of them knows the difference between local and remote paths. File accesses from UNC paths are handled entirely by the Windows kernel itself.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.