Tell me more ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 0 down vote favorite

There might repeat a similar question as I have already wrote, but now I am looking, slightly deeper ...

Very different processors, I wonder what the processor is sufficient enough for the Blender program the speed blender requirements as written in his "normal requirements". Writes that there should be 2GHz. But the older 2GHz processor is not equal to the newer processor is also the 2GHz frequency. I looked under http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 2.8GHz Dual Core and it is a passmark of 1500, it is enough for me that I would start learning Blender. But I want "nettop" Mini-PCs, and that he has been eyeing 900 passmark under the CPU benchmark. Interesting enough for me or how that would be enough to start the 1500 passmark learn Blender and Unity3D.

The News writes that the Atom processors that are faster than the Phenom II, it might be advisable to wait for the new Atom processor, and start to learn, however, that Blender may be sufficient and the nettop that has 900 passmark? I repeat, I just need to start learning Blender, so it may be enough, and a slower processor so I believe.

Maybe Blender normal rquirements has in mind for the Intel Pentium Dual E2180@2.00GHz with 1.126 passmark. Interested in whether it will be very different from the CPU with 900 passmark?

share|improve this question
to begin to learn and who is learned and know Blender may be required exactly the same CPU speed. – Saulius Sep 8 '11 at 11:28
maybe you can post your cpubenchmark passmark if it is enough for Blender. – Saulius Sep 8 '11 at 11:30
I will post this question to Game Development - Stack Exchange – Saulius Sep 8 '11 at 11:36
If the nettop that I saw would be too slow, I have to use a TV tuner purposes only. I think my question is very personal, you can delete it from site – Saulius Sep 8 '11 at 14:46

closed as not constructive by DragonLord, random♦ Sep 15 '11 at 2:47

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.