Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I ask because it's being discontinued very soon and I'd like to make sure I've downloaded all versions. (I only have 32-bit Windows installed at the moment and the website might serve a different binary depending on your operating system)

share|improve this question
Have you considered alternatives: Copernic Desktop Search, Exalead Desktop Search, InSight Desktop Search – Simon Dec 11 '12 at 16:42

No, they did not create a 64 bit version. Later versions were compatible with 64 bit systems. There was no need or benefit in creating a 64 bit version, as its internal database was small and quick.

Do you really want a desktop search application gobbling up 4GB or more of memory if it was available to it?

share|improve this answer
A 64-bit executable doesn't necessarily use a lot more memory. The main thing is that it's more future-proof, eg. if Microsoft drops support for 32-bit. – Hugh Allen Sep 11 '11 at 7:46
Actually, it does eat up more memory. Those 32bit data structures? Ya, they doubled in size. – surfasb Sep 11 '11 at 8:20
@surfasb: yes, c-style pointers are doubled in size, but other data types aren't necessarily. And RAM is cheap and if you're running 64-bit you probably have plenty of it. – Hugh Allen Sep 11 '11 at 9:56
Sigh. How do you think the memory manager references those other data structures. Oh, with the other 64 bit pointer. . . – surfasb Sep 11 '11 at 13:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.