Why would Intel processors have extremely high memory bandwidths but relatively low memory capacity?

link|improve this question

80% accept rate
Umm, the 8GB limit has nothing to do with the processor. . . – surfasb Sep 15 '11 at 2:14
feedback

closed as not constructive by Breakthrough, random Sep 15 '11 at 2:43

This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Because you want to read the memory as fast as possible. With that configuration, it will take 380ms to read the entire 8GB of memory. That may seem fast, but 380ms is a long time as far as the processor is concerned.

Considering a modern processor can do billions of floating point operations in a second, that last thing you want is to have it held up waiting for memory access.

link|improve this answer
+1 for great answer. So no matter how fast your memory is, the connection needs to handle it? – wizlog Sep 15 '11 at 1:12
feedback

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.