Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why does windows insist on always putting the first partition at sector 2048 on a HDD? Between the MBR and that is just wasted space full of zeros.

Is there some special reason for that? Yea its only 1MB but still... the space can't be made use of so it is wasted.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Linker3000, random Sep 17 '11 at 1:48

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

You sure the drive isn't GPT instead of MBR? – Breakthrough Sep 16 '11 at 11:23
up vote 3 down vote accepted

It's for sector-alignment on the newer Advanced Format drives with 4K sectors, and for the future. It's apparently mentioned in a now-withdrawn Microsoft Knowledge Base article, captured and quoted on Wikipedia:

In earlier versions of Windows, the default starting offset for the first partition on a hard disk drive was sector 0x3F. Because this starting offset was an odd number, it could cause performance issues on large-sector drives because of misalignment between the partition and the physical sectors. In Windows Vista, the default starting offset will generally be sector 0x800.

If in the future we go to 16K or even 1MB sectors, you can image an old disk onto a new one, and the partition will still be aligned.

The half-MB blocks on SSDs that Robert mentioned also makes sense. If you're going to realign something, pick a nice round number.

share|improve this answer
MBR malware is now taking advantage of that unused second 1k of space to store code, wonderful. – Moab Sep 16 '11 at 20:04
There were still 62 sectors that malware could use previously. Any malware author worth his salt could cram something in there ;). – Bigbio2002 Sep 16 '11 at 20:29

I assume that is a precautionary measurement because of disk devices that use internally larger block sizes. This is especially important for solid state disks that usually groups the cells internally to pages of 512KB. Without a correct alignment data (write) rates would decrease massively.

For details of SSD internals see

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .