Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

With all the differences between Linux and Windows, this one boggles me the most. Why not agree on a standard? Do they remain different just to be different? Generally this isn't a big problem until you make the mistake of clicking one if you're used to the other.

share|improve this question
Standardization kills innovation. – Praveen Sripati Sep 26 '11 at 17:19
The best part about standards is that there are so many to choose among. – Dan Neely Sep 26 '11 at 18:53
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Ubuntu is agreeing on a standard, it is just not the standard which was set by Windows. Ubuntu is following the GNOME Human Interface Guideline. You can find the part about the placement of the OK and Cancel buttons in section 3.4.2 (link to archived version in internet archive).

share|improve this answer

Ubuntu tries to standardise things a bit, which means some buttons get moved around. They coudl standardise with the other button arrangement, but that would mean moving other things around and upset someone else.

They also move the "preferences" menu items in a lot of programs, Firefox for instance, so that it is in more-or-less the same place in more apps.

share|improve this answer

The Keep and Discard buttons in Chromium have a purpose. Besides, the standard is OK and Cancel. You'll see these buttons on other Chromium dialogues. Oh, you usually access preferences in Edit > Preferences as opposed to Tools > Options in Windows.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.