Is your VM networked using NAT (so that outgoing connections use the host IP)? If so, you could use bridged networking instead, which would give the VM its own IP address, and so be presented as a unique source to the VPN gateway. This is provided your outgoing connections are not NATted to a single public IP address as they traverse the internet on the way to the VPN gateway. In which case you'd need a router that supports multiple VPN sessions (you would need this even if the two VPN clients were on two physical boxes).
Update
In bridge-mode, the VM gets its own virtual interface. It is bridged to the physical interface just so it can communicate on the ethernet cable plugged into the physical interface. Other than that, it is effectively separate from the IP stack on the physical interface. This means that any routing that takes place on the physical interface isn't relevent - the VM is not even aware of it. It has its own IP address and its own routing table. It gets its IP from your dhcp server on your network or is statically assigned. If it wants to talk to the internet router, it has to do an arp request for it and communicates directly.
Having said all that, the Cisco VPN client is sometimes sneaky. It is possible that it is blocking any traffic traversing the interface it has bound to its VPN adapter that does not originate from the machine it is running on. In which case, you will need a separate nic dedicated to the VM.