Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Since SSDs are still fairly new, there isn't a history of posts saying "I reached my writes limit on 10% of my SSD... – and here is what happened (I.e. I lost 3 directories of work files. The entire drive just died...). Maybe it starts churning as the available sectors are reduced way down - like a PC with low memory.

They tell us that these devices will only last a few years. That is frightening - THEN WHAT HAPPENS? No one seems to know. Is it "instant paperweight" or a few files here and there vanish? Or do the SSD utilities constantly monitor and warn you long before the drive dies?

share|improve this question

It's a bit of a myth that SSDs will wear out, especially for typical desktop use. (At least, this applies to SSDs from the past few years that have proper wear-levelling.) Even if you write 7GB/day to a decent 256GB 25nm-process SSD, the flash memory should last for tens, if not hundreds, of years. It's far more likely that the controller hardware or software will fail, given the number of failures that have been reported by manufacturers and users.

In theory, it is possible to read data even after all program/erase (p/e) cycles have been used up. In fact, the JEDEC specifies that data on consumer-grade SSDs should be readable for one year after all p/e cycles have been exhausted. So the likelihood of losing data due to the drive reaching the end of its lifetime is small; it's more likely that you'll have replaced or upgraded your system by then.

share|improve this answer

What happens when an SSD fails? The same thing that happens when a mechanical hard drive fails: You recover from your backups onto a new drive, and continue on.

share|improve this answer
I read that whereas Hard drives often fail completely, losing all of your data . . . SSDs are more likley to fail, losing "some" of your data. The author was predicting what happens when the drive begins maxing out on write cycles for a high number of sectors. Of course, a sudden hardware / interface failure is a different story. – Ken Roberts Oct 13 '11 at 14:48
Sure, I understand what you're saying @Ken, but how recoverable your data is highly depends on what state the software is in when it can no longer write to the drive. I've heard people saying "SSDs are great because when they reach the end of their life they just become read-only, so you can mount them up and copy data off." That seems a bit optimistic... But also, it seems likely to lead someone to saying "I don't have to do backups now", which is absolutely wrong. IMHO, forget what happens when an SSD dies, make sure you have good backups. – Sean Reifschneider Oct 13 '11 at 16:22
Oh, and FYI: The only SSD I've had fail so far started showing up with 8MB capacity. Note that this was NOT the Intel 320 series drive that has this as a well known failure mode with firmware fixes. – Sean Reifschneider Oct 13 '11 at 16:24

This article published July 2011 talks about SSD failure modes: . He has found that they are roughly as reliable as 1TB drives. Talking to sites that use many SSDs, they found that SSDs tend to fail catastrophically, compared to HD's that degrade gracefully over time.

share|improve this answer
I object to the assertion that HDDs "degrade gracefully over time". In my experience, by the time they reach the failure mode that most people notice, they've been thrashed by the OS enough that data recovery is often quite difficult. The most common time I see HDD failures noticed is after running software updates, when the corruption affects the OS and in essence bricks the computer from the user's POV. – SplinterReality Oct 18 '11 at 2:15
So far, both SSD and magnetic HDDs I've seen dying do the same: When you try to access a broken spot, they go to la-la land and won't respond to anything until they're power cycled. – XTL Mar 27 '12 at 13:39
@Splinter the point made in the article is that SSDs fail to give advance warning via SMART. May not be significant for the users who ignore it, but it's an important difference for everyone else. – Tobu Oct 27 '13 at 11:27
@Tobu, it would be great if all OSes popped up warnings and really alerted the user when a SMART failure was noticed, but even that is only about 50% according to Google and their massive experience with drive failure. I've seen both Windows and Mac OSX fail spectacularly during Software Updates with a failing drive. In neither case did SMART help or predict the failure. It's also pretty weak sauce to say "users who ignore it". USERS WILL! It's the SO or SD's responsibility to ensure that doesn't happen. Vista's incessant popups didn't help with the ignoring it problem either. – SplinterReality Oct 28 '13 at 0:20
@SplinterReality In my anecdotal experience, the OS is most often the canary. Heavily-written files like swap-file or registry fail first, making the system unusable and prompting for drive repair. More rigorous SMART monitoring would be good. But they won't help SSDs in their current state. HDDs slowly "burn", SSDs spontaneously "explode". So, compared to SSDs, I'd call the HDD's degradation rather graceful. – Ark-kun Jun 9 '14 at 19:37

Like (hard) disk drives they are made from multiple sub-systems and components, and can fail in multiple ways. Some instant, some partial/incremental.

SSD drives use the S.M.A.R.T. (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) systems that disk drives use to keep track of problems, and (if queried by the BIOS/OS) alert you of potential failures.

share|improve this answer

To really know how these things fail, maybe you can get Ian over on Dangerous Prototypes to build an SSD destroyer. We've already seen what happens to a flash EEPROM subjected to the Flash Destroyer after 11.49 million writes.

share|improve this answer
LULZ, I thought SSD destroyer meant . . . – surfasb Oct 13 '11 at 9:33

I think all newer SSD drives (anything beyond 1st generation) are designed to still be readable but you will start to have problems writing to some blocks which I presume SMART will tell you.

Sounds much better than using mechanical drives which (in my experience) tend to fail mechanically which results in catastrophic failure.

share|improve this answer

What I have heard is that ssd's fail on write and not on read. Therefore, it is much more likely that you will not loose data but, if you have unsaved documents you won't be able to save them (in the worst case scenerio).

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .