Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a MAC filter in place for everything that connects to my router. I also have WPA2 on the wireless.

When a friend comes around, I tell them the password (I trust them), they type it into their device, I then go to the admin screen, check the logs, add the MAC address to the filter and save.

Thinking about this process, it seems like since I have to add the MAC address before the device can connect properly, is there any benefit to actually having a password on the wireless?

It seems to me the answer is no (ignoring the fact that other people may see "Open" wifi and try to connect - I doubt I'll be DoS'ed). The only concern I have is how much access the device has to the network before the MAC filter kicks in - eg could an unknown device send a packet to other wifi devices / the local network?

In case it's relevant, the router in question is the D-Link DIR-615

share|improve this question
3  
Isn't it fairly easy to fake MAC addresses? –  Keith Thompson Oct 16 '11 at 0:50
1  
True - Is it easy to intercept the MAC address(es) to spoof? Although I agree that's enough of a concern to justify passwords. Post as an answer and I'll accept. –  Basic Oct 16 '11 at 0:53
    
I think the real question isn't "is there any benefit to actually having a password on the wireless?", but rather "is there any benefit to having MAC address filtering on the wireless?". –  squircle Oct 16 '11 at 1:21

2 Answers 2

up vote 18 down vote accepted

Absolutely not.

MAC Addresses are painfully easy to sniff out and spoof. MAC address filtering is useful - in my experience - only when you're only concern is "ordinary" computer users who won't go any farther than failing to connect to the network. Handy for kicking off a roommate who has abused your generosity at keeping a network open by hogging bandwidth or the like, without incurring much inconvenience to yourself.

But for anyone even remotely determined to poke about your network? It's not enough.

share|improve this answer
2  
+1 MAC filtering is only useful to prevent accedental connection. Like say both you and your neigbhor's router is called Linksys. However if somone has intent to connect it is trivial to overcome. –  Scott Chamberlain Oct 16 '11 at 5:08

It is much more important to have a strong encryption method (e.g. WPA2 AES) and key (i.e. password) if you want a secure wireless network.

Without them, others nearby can easily see what you're doing online, fake your identity (online or even real) and attack your computers. MAC filtering does nothing here because the most basic skill of a WiFi hijacker is to sniff and fake MAC addresses.

The MAC filter is only useful if you want to control users from the wired network or if you're forced to use a weak encryption (e.g. WEP). Still it's only useful again honest users/computers and is generally an overkill for home use.

If you want real security/access control, you should disable plain routing/NAT and use PPPoE, 802.1x or VPN to connect your computers to your router.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.