Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In cmd, when we press Ctrl+C we get the target application terminated but if the target application is called from a batch file, we get this "Terminate batch job (Y/N)" confirmation. I can never remember an instance where I chose not to terminate the batch job. How can we skip this confirmation?

share|improve this question
Did you ever try sgmoore's answer? superuser.com/questions/35698/… –  Arjan Sep 27 '09 at 10:40
add comment

12 Answers

up vote 18 down vote accepted

AFAIK you can't as this behavior is by design and controlled by the command interpreter. There is no method of "mapping" or even "intercepting" this unless you de-compile and recompile the interpreter directly.

share|improve this answer
That's disappointing :( –  Srikanth Sep 4 '09 at 12:42
Yes it is disappointing. What’s even more disappointing is that the BREAK command, which by default does nothing under XP, could have been used to toggle the prompt… –  Synetech Dec 24 '09 at 19:12
Though it might be true one cannot make the interpreter behave differently, using start like sgmoore suggested at superuser.com/questions/35698/… seems a perfectly fine workaround to me. –  Arjan Jan 6 '10 at 16:44
add comment

Gringo's solution is good, but doesn't work well with scripts which just pass along the argument list (i.e. python myscript.py %*), since SHIFT doesn't update %*. There are workardouns, but they have certain limitations.

Here's the modification I ended up with:

    python myscript.py %*
) ELSE (
    CALL %0 %* <NUL

99.(9)% flawless.

share|improve this answer
add comment

At this site, I found an effective solution:

script2.cmd < nul

To not have to type this out every time I made a second script called script.cmd in the same folder with the line above. I've tested this technique on XP only, but others have confirmed it on Win 7.

Nathan adds: another option is to put the following code at the top of script.cmd which does the same thing in one file:

rem Bypass "Terminate Batch Job" prompt.
if "%~1"=="-FIXED_CTRL_C" (
   REM Remove the -FIXED_CTRL_C parameter
) ELSE (
   REM Run the batch with <NUL and -FIXED_CTRL_C
share|improve this answer
If you call a batch file from within itself (without using the CALL command), execution is "permanently" transferred. If STDIN is redirected to NUL, any "Terminate Batch Job" prompt will still appear, but won't wait (because STDIN is gone) for input. This works for me ... –  William Feb 22 '13 at 7:54
This works in Windows 7. –  William Feb 22 '13 at 7:54
It works, unless you need user input in the batch. –  Augusto Men Mar 27 '13 at 14:51
@William, Just calling the script didn't work for me, but I came up with a workaround: @IF ""=="%1" (@%0 CALLED < nul) ELSE (@[your command]). Calls itself recursively, but with an argument the second time. If your script has arguments, you could potentially use the first unused positional argument. That could be problematic if your script has a lot of arguments. My script didn't need arguments or user input. –  jpmc26 Jul 19 '13 at 23:58
jpmc's answer worked for me. It does echo the darn Terminate (y/n)? message at then end though, but doesn't stop for it. –  GGB667 Jan 24 at 19:02
show 1 more comment

Install Clink and change the "terminate_autoanswer" setting.

# name: Auto-answer terminate prompt
# type: enum
# Automatically answers cmd.exe's 'Terminate batch job (Y/N)?' prompts. 0 =
# disabled, 1 = answer 'Y', 2 = answer 'N'.
terminate_autoanswer = 1

This then "just works" with any cmd.exe window. You don't need to alter what's running or otherwise, since clink piggy-backs on cmd.exe.

Frickin' awesome, IMO!

share|improve this answer
Clink is fantastic but this doesn't work for me, using cmd.exe or Console2. It still asks and it doesn't get autofilled. –  twome Apr 22 '13 at 4:43
@tometoftom: Did you change the settings file as above? I had to do that to get it to work. (Note that you have to be an admin to save the file correctly on Windows Vista and up...) –  Macke Apr 22 '13 at 7:53
Yeah, with the settings changed. I'm an admin :( I tried doing the equivalent of "Run as Administror" for executables by making a shortcut of the settings file, right-click -> Properties, Shortcut tab, Advanced... then "Run as Administrator" is greyed out. –  twome Apr 22 '13 at 8:25
Run notepad in admin mode, then edit the file. –  Macke Apr 23 '13 at 12:00
Ah, still no dice. deep sigh Microsoft, for God's sake... –  twome Apr 23 '13 at 18:00
add comment

At the end of your script, just add the following command:
This will not "damage" the behavior of your script, and it seems to prevent CDM to ask if you want to termininate the batch.

share|improve this answer
Didn't work for me. –  Helgi Apr 18 '12 at 18:47
add comment

Simply redirect the batch stdin to null by adding >nul to the end of the line.

share|improve this answer
I think you may have meant <nul (as the >nul sends all stdout to null). –  Brian Phillips Dec 7 '11 at 13:54
add comment

I've been fighting with this desire to avoid the "Terminate batch job" prompt for a little while. My latest epiphany is a bit of a slight-of-hand (or DOS box), by replacing one instance of cmd.exe with another. This is accomplished by executing the command/program via start cmd /k followed immediately by exit in the .BAT file. The original DOS box disappears and the replacement DOS box can be stopped cleanly via Ctrl-C.

Consider the following example of a traceroute that can be interrupted by Ctrl+C, or allowed to complete, returning the user to the C:\> prompt:

@Echo Off
set timeout=100
if not "%2"=="" set timeout=%2
start cmd /k tracert -w %timeout% %1

The environment substitution of a new command interpreter may not be for everyone, but to the naked eye, looks and works well for me.

share|improve this answer
+1 A very novel approach and although I agree ti's not an exact replacement, it works well (although you did worry me when you started your post with "replacing cmd.exe" - security alarms were ringing until I got to the example and realised what you meant) –  Basic Aug 6 '12 at 15:34
add comment

Start works, but now the window opened by the batch file is changed from the options I had and the "properties" are disabled (won't respond).

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you don't need to do anything in the batch file after your application finishes normally, then using the start command ensures that the batch file is already finished by the time you press Ctrl-C. And hence the message will not appear.

For example:

@echo off

set my_command=ping.exe
set my_params=-t www.google.com

echo Command to be executed by 'start': %my_command% %my_params%

:: When NOT using /B or /WAIT then this will create a new window, while
:: execution of this very batch file will continue in the current window:

start %my_command% %my_params%

echo This line will be executed BEFORE 'start' is even finished. So, this
echo batch file will complete BEFORE one presses Ctrl-C in the other window.

:: Just for testing use 'pause' to show "Press any key to continue", to see
:: the output of the 'echo' commands. Be sure to press Ctrl-C in the window
:: that runs the 'ping' command (not in this very window). Or simply remove
:: the next line when confused:


(Tested on Windows XP.)

share|improve this answer
I don't know if start would indeed help, but it sounds plausible to me. So I wonder if the downvote implies that this would NOT work? Or maybe whoever downvoted does not know Windows' start (or especially start /wait and start /b) command? See microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/… then. Please explain the downvote? –  Arjan Sep 4 '09 at 18:48
start won't work. Whenever cmd is running a batch file, tapping Ctrl+C will cause the currently running process to terminate and show the question. –  Joey Sep 5 '09 at 8:54
All I can say, is that it works for me and the significant point is that the cmd is NOT running a batch file (because it has finished). –  sgmoore Sep 5 '09 at 10:15
But could one still terminate the application then? So: can Ctrl-C be used to terminate the application that was invoked using start? (Still sounds plausible to me...) –  Arjan Sep 7 '09 at 12:21
Whether Ctrl-C will terminate the application is independent of whether or not the application is run from a batch file. For example, if (in XP) you start c:\windows\system32\edit, it will not respond to the Ctrl-C regardless of how it is run. However defrag does respond to the ctrl-C. So the simpliest way to test this is to create a batch file that simply says start defrag c: –  sgmoore Sep 7 '09 at 16:00
show 4 more comments

In my case it was the ping.bat file that was right in my user directory (C:\Users\ in Vista or C:\Documents and Settings\ in XP) that was holding the batch job indeterminately.

This batch file was executed whenever I ran ping from the command prompt where the current directory is my user directory. Ping-ing from the Run window, or from other user's directory was running well.

Removed the file from my user dir and the problem was resolved!

share|improve this answer
add comment

Press Ctrl+C twice.

share|improve this answer
This won't work but rather repeats the prompt. –  Joey Sep 17 '09 at 5:25
Are you sure? I just tried it in an XP command prompt and it worked. I’ll check in DOS 7.11 later, but I’m pretty sure that Enter causes it to repeat the prompt, rather than Ctrl-C. –  Synetech Dec 24 '09 at 19:10
I tried it in PS 2.0 on Win7 and it worked. However I have seen the repeating prompt too in the same env. It's a mystery. Still, +1. –  jcollum Nov 22 '11 at 19:06
worked perfectly for me, thanks! –  captainclam Nov 28 '12 at 8:21
I just killed my database by doing that! The script was waiting on "pause", so I did CTRL-C, and then the prompt came, so I did CTRL-C again, and then the batch file hapilly carried on, and deleted my database! @see superuser.com/questions/740004/… –  Sebastien Diot Apr 10 at 11:48
add comment

See this Stack Overflow question.

However, patching cmd.exe is not something I would do for that.

share|improve this answer
add comment

protected by studiohack May 16 '11 at 18:41

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.