I have a homeserver in my flat. The local area network is fast ethernet and an external harddrive is connected to the server via USB 2.0. What is the bottle neck when copying files over the network? USB or LAN? I just wanna know, because if the network itself is the slowest part, then I am going to upgrade to gigabit ethernet.
|
feedback
|
migrated from stackoverflow.com Nov 14 '11 at 21:56
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
|
The bottleneck is the physical drive inside the external enclosure. USB and Fast Ethernet have theoretical transfer speed faster than your average 5400 RPM spinning disk can write/read. | |||||||||||
feedback
|
|
Lets see:
Conclusion: Fast Ethernet is the bottleneck in theory. Upgrading to Gigabit may help a bit, if your homeserver - and the client of course - has a Gigabit interface, but YMMV. | |||
|
feedback
|