Generally, AMD processors are slower then comparable Intel procesors, despite being clocked higher. A friends intel i7 is clocked at 3.2GHz, my AMD phenom is clocked at 3.4GHz. Both are quad cores, yet his CPU outperforms mine. Why is that?
feedback
|
closed as not constructive by techie007, Linker3000, surfasb, Nifle, random♦ Nov 15 '11 at 13:53
This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
Because clock speed has very little to do with it - My 6+ year old (I think it is 6 now!) P4 3.0ghz wouldn't remotely stand up to a Core I3 rated at 2Ghz, it would probably be 4-6x slower on raw number crunching, and due to other improvements/sub routines built in, other tasks will also most likely be slower. AMD machines may have less performance, but, they also cost less - so - it is all swings and roundabouts! For true comparison, I recommend looking here. | |||||
feedback
|
