Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it faster to move files between media in large pieces (i.e. many files and folders within an archive) or move them file-by-file? Is there a significant difference, considering that the file transfer completes with no errors?

share|improve this question
"Better" how? Faster? Less chance of corruption? – Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 Nov 23 '11 at 1:10
@techie007 I meant faster. Edited! – iglvzx Nov 23 '11 at 1:11
@techie007 This is not a duplicate, as they are asking about a queue of file transfers. I am asking about transferring the files as a single archive (e.g. *.zip), as opposed to file-by-file (individually). – iglvzx Nov 23 '11 at 1:13
Do you count the time of archiving and unarchiving? which basically means one copy at each side. – mouviciel Nov 24 '11 at 9:09
up vote 2 down vote accepted

If contents and size are equal, then transferring one file should be faster due to only having one header/index entry to deal with. The setup and tear-down overhead of many files can add significant time to the transfers.

See this SU question for more info: Why does copying the same amount of data take longer if spread across many separate files?

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.