I have quite a slow PC with only 2GB of RAM, Intel Pentium Dual Core 2GHz, Windows 7. I'm using the latest version of handbrake to try and rip a 2 and a half hour DVD but it says it will take 11 hours! I have chosen the iPad preset (as I will later transfer the files to my iPad) which is a 720X576, H.264 (x264), 29.97 fps video but should it really take this long? I am using the Constant quality of RF:20. I'm not really sure what this means and if I am able to change it. There is an option to enter an average bitrate but i don't know what a good quality option would be. I want to have reasonable quality.
|
feedback
|
|
Personally I prefer DVD Decrypter for it's simplicity. It tends to be pretty quick, though I've not benchmarked it against other rippers like Handbrake. Although it's no longer actively developed, it works well and has a multitude of options. | |||||||
feedback
|
|
I use MakeMKV to rip the individual titles from the disc. Next I use VidCoder which is Handbrake at the core but with a better UI. The advantage to doing it in two steps is that I can rip discs fairly quickly and then queue up the files in Vidcoder and just let it run. The thing with Handbrake/Vidcoder is that it is multi-threaded. This means that the better your processor is, the faster it can process video. I bought a cheap $500 quad-core computer for the purpose of doing this. It can rip a disc in 20-30 minutes and it can transcode in less time than it takes to watch when using the default "Normal" profile. It was well worth the price considering the reduced amount of time it takes to process video. | |||||
feedback
|
|
It can be just bad drive or DVD (or chain). I had to say, when I ripped DVD with s system with spec near to yours, I spent ~40 min per DVD. I can't recall, which software was used. Just to note: on really old box (Celeron 2.4 with IDE drives) I cloned DVD for 1h 40m, on fresher box (Quad 8300 with SATA drives) it took 25 minutes. JFYI | |||||||||||
feedback
|