Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is OpenSSH for Windows (using Cygwin) is considered to be robust & stable for enterprise use?

share|improve this question
    
Why not use a Windows-native version (like Putty)? Cygwin won't give you any extra security if that's what you're thinking. –  m0skit0 Jan 25 '12 at 16:40
1  
I think that liorix wants to use OpenSSH as a server, not a client, m0skit0. –  Jim G. Jan 25 '12 at 17:59
    
That's correct, I want to use OpenSSH as server. Thanks –  liorix Jan 26 '12 at 9:16
add comment

2 Answers

You can use freeSSHd. It works fine. No Cygwin required.

freeSSHd, like it's name says, is a free implementation of an SSH server. It provides strong encryption and authentication over insecure networks like Internet. Users can open remote console or even access their remote files thanks to buit-in SFTP server.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I don't see why any other free ssh server solution will outperform a cygwin openssh server on Windows regarding stability. (The installation process may be a little tricky but this doesn't affect stability.)

The cygwin openssh is a direct port of the most used and probably most stable ssh server currently available. I for myself didn't experience any problems yet with all of my cygwin openssh installations on private as well as server machines.

So if you are looking for a free ssh server, why don't give openssh a try?

As for commercial solutions I can't give any recommendation.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.