Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is OpenSSH for Windows (using Cygwin) is considered to be robust & stable for enterprise use?

share|improve this question
Why not use a Windows-native version (like Putty)? Cygwin won't give you any extra security if that's what you're thinking. – m0skit0 Jan 25 '12 at 16:40
I think that liorix wants to use OpenSSH as a server, not a client, m0skit0. – Jim G. Jan 25 '12 at 17:59
That's correct, I want to use OpenSSH as server. Thanks – liorix Jan 26 '12 at 9:16

You can use freeSSHd. It works fine. No Cygwin required.

freeSSHd, like it's name says, is a free implementation of an SSH server. It provides strong encryption and authentication over insecure networks like Internet. Users can open remote console or even access their remote files thanks to buit-in SFTP server.

share|improve this answer

I don't see why any other free ssh server solution will outperform a cygwin openssh server on Windows regarding stability. (The installation process may be a little tricky but this doesn't affect stability.)

The cygwin openssh is a direct port of the most used and probably most stable ssh server currently available. I for myself didn't experience any problems yet with all of my cygwin openssh installations on private as well as server machines.

So if you are looking for a free ssh server, why don't give openssh a try?

As for commercial solutions I can't give any recommendation.

share|improve this answer

OpenSSH seems to be robust and stable because it's standard for every Linux-Machine. The big Problem under Windows is Windows itselve, not the used SSH-Server. freeSSHD is stopped to be developed, OpenSSH is gnu.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .