Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am building 2.6.18 from CentOS source code.

I'm at the last step to the build process in their instructions but seem to be getting an error that I can't understand.

Instructions I'm following:

I ran... [user@host SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb --target=uname -m kernel.spec 2> build-err.log | tee build-out.log

and got...


Patch #20239 (xen-vtd-let-iommu-use-another-irq-without-conflict.patch):
Patch #20240 (xen-hvm-add-hvmop_get_time-hypercall.patch):
Patch #20241 (xen-fix-64-bit-pv-guest-user-mode-segv-crashing-host.patch):
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57640
cc     linux-2.6.18.x86_64/scripts/bin2c.c   -o linux-2.6.18.x86_64/scripts/bin2c
make -f _build
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/~~~~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.18/xen'
make -C include/public/foreign
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/~~~~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.18/xen/include/public/foreign'
python x86_32 x86_32.h ../arch-x86/xen-x86_32.h ../arch-x86/xen.h ../xen.h
python x86_64 x86_64.h ../arch-x86/xen-x86_64.h ../arch-x86/xen.h ../xen.h
python ia64 ia64.h ../arch-ia64.h ../xen.h
python x86_64 checker.c x86_32 x86_64 ia64
gcc -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -m64        
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -o checker checker.c
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/~~~~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.18/xen/include/public/foreign'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/~~~~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.18/xen'

RPM build errors:

I'm not sure why there's no useful messages after "RPM build errors". After I run the above rpmbuild command, I'm supposed to see "custom kernel rpm files" generated in the ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/uname -m/ directory. I do not see anything in that folder.

Here's what I see in the build-err.log:

gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `.'
gpg: keyring `./secring.gpg' created
gpg: keyring `./pubring.gpg' created

Not enough random bytes available.  Please do some other work to give
the OS a chance to collect more entropy! (Need 275 more bytes)
+ gpg --homedir . --export --keyring ./ CentOS
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `.'
+ make linux-2.6.18.x86_64/scripts/bin2c
+ linux-2.6.18.x86_64/scripts/bin2c ksign_def_public_key __initdata
+ rm -rf /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-238.9.1.el5.local-root
+ mkdir -p /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-238.9.1.el5.local-root/boot
+ cd xen
+ mkdir -p /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-238.9.1.el5.local-root/boot /var/tmp/kernel-    
+ make -j2 verbose=y crash_debug=y max_phys_cpus=256 XEN_VENDORVERSION=-238.9.1.el5.local
checker.c:1: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in
make[2]: *** [checker] Error 1
make[1]: *** [build-headers] Error 2
make: *** [build] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57640 (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57640 (%build)
share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

It looks like you're trying to cross-compile a 64-bit kernel on a 32-bit platform (or platform with only a 32-bit development toolchain). 64-bit targets aren't supported by the toolchain you have installed (or the one you have selected if you have more than one).

share|improve this answer
Okay, so I checked in the makefile and the compiler is GCC. I checked my GCC version and it says it's compiling to a target i386. Is it possible for me to simply change this configuration? Or do I need to reinstall GCC to be x86_64 compatible. I have GCC 4.1.2. – barrrista Jan 31 '12 at 22:47
If you pass GCC the -m64 flag, what happens? What is the output of gcc -m64 -v? – David Schwartz Jan 31 '12 at 23:25
didn't know you could do that. gcc -m64 -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-redhat-linux [...] --host=i386-redhat-linux gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48) – barrrista Jan 31 '12 at 23:37
Sounds like you don't have the 64-bit compiler installed on your platform. Are you on a 64-bit platform? – David Schwartz Feb 1 '12 at 0:04
Yes, I believe so. I get uname -a x86_64. I'm trying to update my gcc now via yum. Is this the right way to go? I seem to be having problems with this and created a separate question here:… – barrrista Feb 1 '12 at 0:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.