Which lossless audio format should I use when storing them on my NAS?

Question

I have started a project of ripping my big collection of CDs and storing them on my NAS. Since I care for audio quality I have decided to store them in a lossless format. Right now I have tried to use FLAC. However reading this article makes me having some doubt.

I have considered using Apple lossless (m4a) files. It seems that Apple will support this format for many years to come. However I have not found a way to playback them on my Playstation 3. The m4a format is supported on Mac (of course) and on Windows FLAC on the other hand is supported on all major platforms. The m4a format has the advantage of being able to import to iTunes. Today I mount my NAS and use VLC for playback (on my Mac computer).

We have a Synology NAS, a Mac Book Pro, a Sony PS3 and some Windows computers in my family. Thus I want to be able to playback the audio on all these platforms. The Synology server has the ability to transcode some formats, such as FLAC.

What lossless format do you recommend me to use for storage of my audio files on my NAS? It should be format that is playable on most platforms. It should be future-proof, but I realize that this is hard to predict what will last for many years to come.

One solution would be to keep my FLAC files. I would be able to use them as long as the FLAC format is supported. When another fantastic lossless format arrives, I will have to convert them. As long as it is a lossless format, the audio quality is preserved.

Answer 1

My most direct recommendation for your library of lossless audio is to stick with Flac. It is the premier open standard for lossless audio.

A lot of players do not support flac because there isn't too much demand for lossless digital audio. :-( It still has more general support than any of the proprietary lossless formats.

Something that you should remember when future proofing your collection, is that the lossless digital copy of a CD is still only going to have at most the sound quality of the CD. Which itself is a slightly lossy compression of the raw studio recording, which itself is a slightly noisy copy of the live studio performance. The cumulative effect of all that noise adds up to a net loss of sound quality comparable to the loss of fidelity from Flac to Ogg, Acc, or some of the other more advanced lossy compressions. So, a future lossy compression derived from the original studio recordings may be higher audio quality than your flac of the CD.