Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For about the past two years I've used TrueCrypt to encrypt my entire hard drive. During this time I've had a complete hard drive failure (data unrecoverable, had to RMA the drive) twice. I've never really had a problem with this before. I was wondering if there is any chance that the increased hard disk activity associated with constant encrypting/decrypting might cause a hard drive to fail

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

According to TomsHardware

We found that TrueCrypt had a performance impact on several benchmarks, but the impact is not noticeable if you work with popular desktop applications, in a reasonable manner, using a single encryption algorithm.

It seems reasonable to infer from this that the IO overhead is not ten times normal, is not twice normal but probably much less than that. On that basis I would not expect a hard drive to fail much earlier than without truecrypt.

share|improve this answer

Higher use leads to a higher wear down. Plain and simple, however you might just have had bad luck with that HDD, they can fail pretty much at random, that's the reason why you always need a backup.

share|improve this answer

We are using TrueCrypt on 10+ HDDs for 5+ years and haven't noticed any significant failure rate deviation (there was 1 failed HDD during this time).

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .