Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Why are hardware RAID solutions relatively expensive?

Well, this maybe a very stupid question. Shouldn't RAID controllers be very simple? Compare RAID controller with Linux-based network router, or MPEG decoders, I can't believe a RAID controller needs more technique. Why it's so complex and expensive?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Daniel Beck, surfasb, Dave M, ChrisF, Nifle Feb 8 '12 at 17:36

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It's just supply and demand. The market for RAID controllers is much smaller than the market for routers or MPEG decoders.

share|improve this answer
On top of that, such products do not require the kind of performance RAID users demand. Performance = money. – surfasb Feb 8 '12 at 9:32
True. Your average SOHO router doesn't have to process 6Gb/s. – David Schwartz Feb 8 '12 at 9:55

RAID controllers deal with higher bandwidth and lower latency data streams than your typical network router, and don't have the option of just throwing away data like a router does. I expect much more from any sort of disk controller than I do from a network router.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .