Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm on OS X, and I'm copying a large amount of data from one partition to another. Because of the nature of a magnetic disk, I feel this would go much faster if I can get 'cp' to use a huge buffer of a few hundred megs.

Is this easily possible at all? I'm copying several directories recursively.

share|improve this question

No matter what you do in between, shuffling data within solid-state memory chips, the processes of reading and writing a magnetic/mechanical disk, which requires physically moving pieces of metal, will take orders of magnitude more time, and there's no way to avoid that.

share|improve this answer
Well I figure if the disk reads 100 megs, moves the head, and then writes should be much faster than doing this for every couple of kb's. This is very easily testable. – Evert Feb 16 '12 at 12:35
Random access is just faster that sequential access – Evert Feb 16 '12 at 12:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.