Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Excel 2007/2010 offers an option to save my files in an "Excel Binary Workbook" format that seems to be smaller (50% of the size in some cases) and load more quickly. Is there a downside to this format? Should I be avoiding it for some reason?

I'm thinking there has to be some shortcoming to it, or it would be the default save format instead of XLSX, but I can't figure out what the faults might be. XLSX seems to be reasonably common in other products that can import Excel files, but none of them support XLSB - why not?

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by random Feb 27 '14 at 23:52

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 11 down vote accepted

As stated, xlsb is a binary file type, and saves in binary format. All other xls file types save in open XML format. We're not here to talk about advantages, but disadvantages.

  1. The only real disadvantage is going to be compatibility in using the data with software that wants XML instead of binary (web server for instance). If you link a lot of systems together, this may cause a problem with one of the layers, as XML was developed specifically for this purpose.

  2. Overall, there are no other disadvantages other than the fact that you might not be able to tell if there are macros in it or not as there is no macro-free version of this format. You can just change your macro settings to disable with prompt and examine visual basic to determine if there are harmful macros.

A compelling list to use xlsb as your default file format.

share|improve this answer
I suspected this was the case, but wanted to make sure. From other reading I've done, XLSX appears to be a more open standard, where XLSB is really just the next iteration of the XLS format - proprietary to Microsoft Excel and designed for speed/size, not compatibility. Thanks for your confirmation! – SqlRyan Feb 16 '12 at 20:02
I know this answer is a little dated, but it's incorrect/inaccurate. "Classic" .xls is of course an OLE Compound Document and not XML. – Daniel B Feb 27 '14 at 22:34
In 2007 and 10? – Raystafarian Feb 28 '14 at 2:08

Mac iWork Numbers, Quickview, iOS preview and iOS Numbers do not recognise xlsb files.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for letting me know - I suppose if third-party software is going to allow the import of Excel files, they won't implement two different formats, and will likely only support XLSX, as that's the more "Standards-based" one. – SqlRyan Feb 10 '13 at 20:23

Saving in binary allows formulas to be saved properly if they are longer than the 8192 character limit.

share|improve this answer

I don't use the xlsb format for two reasons.

  1. Because the file has all of the XML plus the binary, the file is larger than the corresponding xlsx or xlsm file.

  2. When I was working with a large and complex file, the binary would get corrupted frequently and I would have to restore from a back up copy of the file.

Update: I tried the xlsb format when it first came out and had the above problems. Problem 1 doesn't happen with Excel 2010 so maybe problem 2 is fixed also.

On the other hand, even if all of the above is fixed, I still won't use xlsb very often because most of my Excel files are actually VBA projects. Tracking a binary in a code repository will bloat the repository pretty quickly. (I use Mercurial for my code repository and, with the zipdoc extension turned on, I can tell it that xlsx AND xlsm files are zipped XML text files instead of binary.)

share|improve this answer
Every time I've used xlsb files, they've been significantly smaller than the same file as an xlsx. – afrazier Feb 22 '12 at 0:06
@afrazier, Thanks for letting me know! I need to remember to double-check tech stuff when my knowledge is over 3 years old. – mischab1 Feb 22 '12 at 22:31
Just for reference here, I've been using XLSB almost exclusively since posting this question a year ago, will no ill effects - no corrupted data or files, and in addition to be smaller, they load in about half the time. – SqlRyan Feb 10 '13 at 20:24

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .