Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

"Windows Rot", defined as the build up of old programs distributing shared files everywhere, having several unnecessary programs running at start up and cluttering the registry can significantly slow down a computer. However, a solid state drive dramatically increases the read/write speed of both shared windows files and the registry hive, as well as rapidly starting programs several factors more quickly than a traditional spinning drive.

In a modern computer with quick memory, a solid state drive and a modern version of windows, is the "Windows Rot" effect noticeable after several years of use, compared to using a spinning drive?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by ChrisF, Tom Wijsman, Simon Sheehan, Mokubai, Nifle Feb 18 '12 at 13:36

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I would say yes, because the increase in speed is not exponential, but the slow down might as well be. – rubixibuc Feb 17 '12 at 6:36
Might also be relevant here:… – Oliver Salzburg Feb 18 '12 at 13:30

The SSD is not any more susceptible to "windows rot" than a spinny drive. The speed of the SSD is a lot more, so any speed decrease may be less or more depending on whether it's CPU being eaten, disk space running out, memory being hogged, etc.

The drive being SSD or not has no bearing on whether or not the system will or will not slow down due to poor maintenance.

share|improve this answer

The thing is, the point where you might have went "Maybe these are too many startup processes", has moved.
So while an SSD helps with the current state of "Windows Rot" (don't like that term), the next level of rot is already cooking up.

share|improve this answer
It a spin off of bit rot, in reality its just a Windows – Moab Feb 17 '12 at 17:28

lol, windows rot :-), I have an XP system that has been on the same install for 11 years now, with 150+ programs. It is faster today than the day it was installed. Just have to chip off all the rotting and useless stuff, keeping the fresh meat going stronger.

Windows 7 differs in that things are harder to remove, the registry is more bloated and harder to delete things. There is all the extra compatibility there, and being added , especially in 64bit version. More MUI , tracing and logging, more bloated programs that we buy and install. The same older stuff from before, now with more bloation and filled with features. More dependencies in all ways, both the systems and the programs. If you got rot before, you got more rot now.

Many thing go in, and do not come back out, if I can get 300 pages of space and 2 weeks I will show you some of them :-) but you will just want the summary. And quick fix removals all have ramifications, so there is no script or program that could possibly address everyones specific junkpiles.

SSDs start slowing down the more full and mixed up they are, depending on the size of the SSD, windows 7, I could GUESS that the rot factor would be at least doubled, relative to the original install and speeds. (uhh mostly due to the system and the user junk)

All of which could could be changed by doing maintenance , maintenance that is harder than fresh installs, and that is getting harder and harder to do at all. SSDs have maintenance routines also.

SSD slowdowns on modern 2011 drives are . .. About like that (Minor) win7 supports trim and therfore DOES the maintance.

Hard drives get to ~1/2 speed when the slower parts of the platters are used, But this is about the OS, so partitioning the system at the front end of the hard drive would keep that aspect of it completely out of the picture, leaving just the fragmentation, which Again win7 maintenance with a defragmentation routine.

Relative- The SSD is so fast, if the whole system was a complete mess, there was no maintance, no trim, not garbage collection, the SSD speeds could keep the system going awesomly. But will that make the system not slow down with trash? I/O has costs beyond any one items speeds. Relative to when it was first installed and everything was going wonderfull, there are thousands of reports of the system becomming a dog - Relative.

Benchmark the same system, that a user claims is "suffering from windows rot" , is the cpu slower? noo, gee did the GPU start loosing transisters :-) , do the drives all test out as operational and about as fast as before, when there is nice clean spaces to write to , yes. So gee, what could have possibly happened , Magic :-) Just apply some re-install vodo, and everything you personalised, and set up , and installed will be tossed out with the dirty bathwater.
What has happened is much thicker and more complex and often has to do with many aspects of the system, it isn't just programs, it isn't just leftovers, it isn't just drivers, it isn't just running things, it isn't just the registry. it usually is everything, adding in its own complexities and very minor things on thier own, that compound.

I maintain that there is no such thing as windows rot, give me 8 more years , and beating the system to death and tossing out tens of thousands of registry entries, disabling services, and chucking drivers I don't use, and I will prove it :-) in the meantime keep your re-install disk handy :-)

Better , Make a clone image of the fully operational system that you really like, and retract back to it instead.

share|improve this answer
I think you're looking for the word "bloated" ;) – Oliver Salzburg Feb 17 '12 at 9:20
Yes thanks, that one, all the things I installed and the spell checker is still waiting. – Psycogeek Feb 17 '12 at 9:21
Sure, there is only 1 useful piece of information in my post, at the bottom of the post. I agree The rest of it probably should be downvoted. Right after your downvote , to make me happy just follow the last sentance. – Psycogeek Feb 18 '12 at 0:09

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.