Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have project with the usual directory structure (src/, bin/, ...), i.e

|-- bin
|-- lib
|-- src
`-- Makefile

And would like to create an archive with the following directory structure:

|-- bin
|-- lib
|-- src
`-- Makefile

Is there a neat way to do this, which avoids creating a temporary directory project-name/ elsewhere, then copying the files inside a finally calling zip -r ... on that temporary directory?

(I am basically looking for some kind of path prefix or relative path option.)

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Maybe this already occurred to you, but why not just use a sym link rather than copy everything?

ln -s project-name project-name-version

then use zip -r through the sym link (zip will dereference sym links by default)? When you're done you can simply rm the sym link. Perhaps it's not the most elegant solution, but I don't know an obvious way to do it through zip directly.

share|improve this answer

This is more an advice than an answer: use Git!

If you setup a Git repository for your project, the whole thing become quite straightforward:

git archive HEAD --prefix=project-name-version/ \
    --format=zip -o
share|improve this answer
Excellent advice, thank you. git archive documentation: – Meglio Jul 12 '15 at 4:53
While using version control is a good idea, this answer does not match the question for the generic case. – Raim Apr 20 at 14:16
@Raim "This is more an advice than an answer: use Git!" written there since like 4 years, thank you for pointing it out... – cYrus Apr 20 at 14:24
If this was not intended as an answer, it should be converted to a comment. – Raim Apr 20 at 15:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .