Under Windows XP, what are some alternatives to the default disk defragmenter?
closed as not constructive by slhck♦ Nov 8 '12 at 22:21
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.
|
Defraggler from the same guys who brought you CCleaner and Recuva! All are great pieces of software. |
|||||
|
|
JKdefrag is what I have been using to great effect. It's also Free! |
|||||||||||
|
|
I was using O&O Defrag for years, but recently switched to PerfectDisk. PerfectDisk is still able to defragment even when the hard drive has very little free disk space. |
|||||||
|
|
PerfectDisk is one that actually works and is not totally annoying. :) |
|||
|
|
|
Power Defragmenter, a free GUI for Sysinternals' Contig. Haven't used the latest version, but I found that the previous version's Power Defragment mode was both fast and effective. |
||||
|
|
|
DisKeeper is good.. has a managed version for enterprise. http://www.diskeeper.com/ |
|||
|
|
|
O&O Defrag, http://www.oo-software.com/home/en/products/oodefrag/index.html. It will actually move files around (instead of just defragging individual files). In this way files that are in the same folder will all be physically be close on the disk. It can also defrag files that are in use by Windows (e.g. the MFT) by doing defragging at boot time. This however requires that the defragging runs as a result of being defined in a job. I can recommend it. I have used it for many years without any problems and it is not intrusive; there is no noticeable degradation in performance while it runs. |
|||
|
|