Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There have been at least a few threads about Explorer replacements, aka alternative file managers, here on Superuser. The go-to thread seems to be this one: Replacement for Windows Explorer?

But what I would like to have is a narrower subset of these available choices with the feature that I indicated in the title: that is, I am interested only in such Explorer replacements which integrate themselves with Windows and do not need to be opened or launched. In other words, if I double click a folder, then the folder would be opened by this Explorer replacement. This is in contrast to how many alternative file managers are, which do not take over from Explorer. I did some searching, and user fluxtendu linked a cool wikipedia page containing feature comparisons between file managers, but unfortunately it doesn't mention the feature that I'm looking for.

I am already aware from personal experience of one that fulfills this criterion: Explorer++. And I was told by afrazier that Directory Opus and explorer2 also do this. What other options exist?

And of course, I would also appreciate recommendations. I guess I wasn't totally happy with Explorer++, which is why I want to try out others.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

The problem is that Windows Explorer also provides the whole shell for Windows. So when you click that Folder icon, you're most likely already using Explorer. It just starts another process (or window).

You might want to look into shell replacements.


Ok, let me go into a little bit more detail about my understanding of things.

How the whole system works

Let's start with my desktop.
My desktop is drawn by the shell. The shell is provided by the initial explorer.exe process that runs when Windows starts. If I have a folder on my desktop:
enter image description here

I can double-click it to open it: enter image description here

This created a new explorer.exe process which is now displaying the window that shows the contents of my folder. But there are many way the same window could have been opened.

So why did Windows to decide to use explorer.exe to display that folder?
Well, as I said, the desktop is already an explorer.exe process. So it will simply use ShellExecuteEx() to let the shell decide what to do with it. The shell will then create a new explorer.exe instance (because it is hard-wired to do so to my knowledge).

So what you can do, is not use explorer.exe to provide your shell (as you already seem to do). You can simply provide an alternative application in the registry under:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\Shell

But nobody is stopping that new shell from calling ShellExecuteEx(), which would, again, invoke the default shell and, thus, explorer.exe!

So, what now?

So if you really want to replace Windows Explorer, replace the file explorer.exe. Because, in the end, every program could still try to execute C:\Windows\explorer.exe directly and then you have the same old Explorer again.

But, please keep in mind, I have never attempted to replace explorer.exe on a system, so I don't know if that would even be possible and/or stable to use.

How does application XYZ do it?

There are several applications that simply plug into Explorer, like QTTabBar. Maybe Explorer++ works the same way. This way you don't need to touch anything as your modification is always loaded into new explorer.exe processes. Going into detail about that process would take a whole new answer.

What about the File-Open dialog?

This is a whole new set of problems. The File Save and File Open dialogs are part of the Common Dialogs Library. Trying to replace those is hard to imagine. Pretty much the same can be said about those as I said about explorer.exe. But this would be far more scary.

share|improve this answer
I was once looking for exactly the same thing. Back then, I was unable to find a satisfactory solution (other than shell replacement). And every single shell replacement for Windows is simply a disappointment. –  Oliver Salzburg Mar 2 '12 at 18:57
I already use a shell replacement: SharpEnviro. That's a whole different topic that I am also interested in, but my understanding is that most shell replacements actually just target the desktop environment: they replace the taskbar, start menu, give you new tool bars, change how the desktop looks and how it works. But they don't touch the file manager part of Explorer at all. That's how SharpE is, and that's how Emerge and also Aston Shell were when I tried each of them briefly. It looks like Cairo shell is one that has everything, including its own file manager, but I rather like SharpE... –  StormRyder Mar 2 '12 at 20:14
Anyway, what are you saying about it being the problem? Are you saying that what I am looking for is not possible? I do realize that most likely I won't be able to replace Explorer completely -- for example, doing File > Open in any application will still bring up the standard Explorer dialog box. That's how it is when I use Explorer++. But still, Explorer++ definitely does take over from Explorer in virtually every other instance. Clicking "Computer" opens it in Explorer++, for example. That kind of "almost" solution is indeed possible, and it's good enough for me. –  StormRyder Mar 2 '12 at 20:23
I updated my question with my understanding of things. Hopefully you'll find it helpful. –  Oliver Salzburg Mar 2 '12 at 21:00
Thank you for the update! A couple comments. 1.) I up-voted your post because that is some useful info in there. Those details you went into helped broaden my understanding. 2.) However, I really didn't like the way you edited my title because I feel like that hijacked my thread into topics I didn't want to get into. It makes my thread look like a duplicate of others. You're getting into some things that are pretty much the topic of this thread: superuser.com/q/241442/60860 –  StormRyder Mar 3 '12 at 7:28
show 3 more comments

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.