Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently found a box of old 5.25" floppies. Is there a way to tell the double-density (360K) 5.25" ones from the high-density (1.2M) ones when the disks do not have any markings? It looks like the DD ones have the hub ring in the centre (if you’ve seen one you know what I mean) and the HD ones don’t, but maybe I’m mistaken.

share|improve this question
    
I vaguely recall that the 1.2M ones have a notch in the side, in addition to the write notch along the top. –  Daniel R Hicks Mar 7 '12 at 17:09
    
@DanH You are talking about 3,5" floppies. –  kinokijuf Mar 7 '12 at 17:50
    
There was something about the notches on the 1.2M 5.25" floppies. Maybe there was a second notch on the top or some such. –  Daniel R Hicks Mar 8 '12 at 1:58
    
@DanH No, there isn’t. I have them to confirm. –  kinokijuf Mar 8 '12 at 12:45
    
Well, maybe I'm thinking of 8" floppies. I definitely remember another notch -- made the diskette as flimsy as slice of Swiss cheese. –  Daniel R Hicks Mar 8 '12 at 17:03
add comment

3 Answers 3

Unless the manufacturer chose to mark the disks, there's no difference between them.

The ring in the centre of the disk was a manufacturing feature to prolong the life of the disk itself.

Double-sided disks will have the write-protect notch on both the left and right sides of the disk if they were intended for use in single-sided drives, but even that isn't a reliable indicator of sidedness.

You should generally be safe assuming DSDD for 5.25" disks, however, as DSHD 5.25" disks weren't very common (3.5" disks were more durable and reliable).

share|improve this answer
    
-1. It is a mixture of DD and HD disks plus some without any stickers whatsoever. As I indicated, all of the DD ones have the ring, while none of the HD ones have. –  kinokijuf Mar 7 '12 at 17:26
2  
I've owned many 5.25" DD floppies without hub rings. HD floppies would frequently not have a ring, but it definitely isn't a reliable indicator that a disc is HD. –  EKW Mar 7 '12 at 17:33
    
See link in my answer. They say that the ring sometimes falls off. –  kinokijuf Mar 7 '12 at 17:43
1  
@kinokijuf, yes, and it also says that it is not a reliable indicator like EKW said: DD 5.25" (360kB) diskettes look very much like HD 5.25" (1.2MB) diskettes; however, HD diskettes seem to almost never have a hub ring, while DD diskettes usually do. –  Synetech Mar 7 '12 at 18:01
2  
With the caveat that it isn't 100% reliable, if you've noticed that pattern with the manufacturer in your stack of disks, it may be a reliable indicator for that manufacturer. –  EKW Mar 7 '12 at 18:57
show 2 more comments
up vote 0 down vote accepted

This site seems to confirm my observations:

DD 5.25" (360kB) diskettes look very much like HD 5.25" (1.2MB) diskettes; however, HD diskettes seem to almost never have a hub ring, while DD diskettes usually do. The hub ring may be white paper, etc. and easy to spot or cut from the same material as the diskette and barely noticeable. This difference has been mentioned by Peter Norton (of Norton Utilities fame) in one of his books.
share|improve this answer
1  
We dont like link only answers, could you add some actual information? –  Simon Sheehan Mar 10 '12 at 13:28
add comment

DD disks have a hub ring, HD do not. HD were quite common. There were actually Quad-Density disks also, which were a quirky standard used on some early Tandy/Radio Shack Model 2000 systems.

Notching is not an indication of single sided vs. double sided. A true double sided drive has 2 heads, and reads and writes both sides simultaneously. A Commodore, Atari, Apple, for example, only had one head, so people would notch the disk to flip it and use the opposite side. The media was certified for writing on both surfaces.

Many people warned that flipping the disks would lead to early failure, but I just used some 32 year old 'flippies' in an Apple IIe last night with very low failure rate, especially considering the age of the the magnetic surfaces.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.