Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

let's say, I can rsh to machine XXX as user foo, then after executing:

$result=$(rsh -l foo XXX "ls");
echo $result;

I found that the line feed is removed in the result, and I can't see the result in a line by line way. so what I should do if I'd like to have the line feed int the returned result?

share|improve this question
    
You should not have a dollar sign in front of the varible name when you assign to it. rsh=$(rsh -l foo XXX "ls"). The terminating semicolons are redundant but harmless. –  tripleee Mar 12 '12 at 8:05

2 Answers 2

Edit: If you mean the newlines between each file, just make sure to quote the result:

result="$(rsh -l foo XXX "ls");"

This will keep any characters except NUL ($'\0'), which can't be stored in a Bash variable.

If you mean that the trailing newline is lost, then this is the simplest solution I know:

resultx="$(commands...; echo x)"
result="${resultx%x}"
share|improve this answer

The newline is there; the error is in using echo to examine it (without double quotes around the variable, too!)

result=$(rsh -l foo XXX "ls")
echo "$result"
share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.