I've been using Photoshop to retouch photos on windows and would like to try Ubuntu. That's why I'm wondering if I switch to Gimp what features will I lose or gain.
feedback
|
closed as not constructive by random♦ Jul 13 '10 at 0:05
This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
Cons
Pros
If you're used to photoshop, or some kind of professional GIMP probably isn't enough for you. If not, you'll probably be perfectly happy with GIMP | |||
|
feedback
|
Try it. Find out. Answers here wont really tell you what you'll miss, because only you can know that. Potentially, answers could tell you of new features you'll gain, but if you already have PS then - other than the glow of using GNU Free Software rather than proprietary Adobe software - I'm not sure GIMP has anything to offer feature-wise. And don't forget that you don't necessary need to switch, as dual-booting and/or virtualisation are potentially both options that allow you to primarily use Ubuntu but still use Photoshop. | |||||||||
feedback
|
|
First of all Gimp is much cheaper than Photoshop;-) The user interface is another thing: And finally GIMP has no CMYK support. | |||||||||||
feedback
|
|
GIMP is based primarily for Web / Screen editing. There's no CMYK support in GIMP because it's not intended for print use. For the most part, you can find a bulk of the essential Photoshop features in Gimp - however, if you're a PS power user like myself, you'll find that different keyboard shortcuts and different tools to do the same task as PS are extremely frustrating. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
From what my wife tells me, Gimp doesn't allow for color correction/calibration. Until this makes it in I'm on the shelling out $$$$ to Adobe program. Otherwise I find it really useful but Paint.Net gets Kudos too. And my wife was wrong... see comment below. | ||||
feedback
|
|
This isn't directly answering the question, but you can run Photoshop quite nicely in Ubuntu using Wine. See the WineHQ entry for more details. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
It's free, it's got versions for various OS's, and it does lots of stuff. I haven't used it for retouching photos, but we have it here on a WinXP computer and it interfaced flawlessly with a scanner. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
Photoshop is industry standard so there is much more support for it of course. Also more tools such as brushes and the lot, but with all this comes a price. GIMP is 100% free on the other hand, but you will not have all the same features at hand. I can't complain... there's an old saying "you get what you pay for".... and you get more than your money's worth with GIMP. | |||
|
feedback
|
Try GIMPshopComing from Photoshop, I found GIMP bewildering and gave up. The whole arrangement of the UI was alien to me. There is a flavor called GIMPshop that's supposed to be more like Photoshop. I haven't tried it, but it might make things easier on you. | |||||||
feedback
|
|
The feature I missed the most when viewing PS tutorials was the brush engine. In PS it is very powerful and you can create all kinds of greatness with it. Of course, if you are going from PS to Gimp you'll probably hate it but if you are starting out new then Gimp will be an awesome tool ... to a paint. Then you can decide whether to get PS if that's the case. | |||
|
feedback
|