Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I can't find out why Windows applications need to be installed. In OS X, applications can just be dragged to /Applications.

Can anyone provide any resources explaining this and what is actually happening during installation (other than copying files)?

share|improve this question
Not all OS X apps are installed like that. Packaged installers similar to those in Windows exist too. – slhck Apr 27 '12 at 7:11
Likewise, install-less Windows programs and "xcopy deployment". You can even use Firefox without any installation. – grawity Apr 27 '12 at 7:34
up vote 3 down vote accepted

As commentors above have noted, not only do many Windows programs not have an installer, but some OS X programs, do.

A few thoughts do come to mind:

  • Part of an installer's job is to compress the payload. You're actually doing that step manually on OS X when you mount a DMG. Without that facility, something has to run to unzip the software.

  • When installers first became popular (mostly, it started with InstallShield being shipped as part of VS 97, I believe) disk space wasn't as plentiful. You wanted a program that would let you pick which features to install.

  • Certainly the most quoted reason for Windows installers is the need to tweak the registry. Now, that could (and often is) done on first run. The classic examples that get set before run are file association and registering shared components.

    • Shared components: a lot less necessary on today's computer than yesteryear. (And honestly, in hindsight, not worth the hassle then, either).

    • File association: an interesting one: if you install a PDF viewer on Windows all, your PDF files will open with it. On a Mac, unless you start messing with Finder settings, it's going to use Kind/Type metadata inside each file. Both behavior has their fans/detractors - but if you want a global change, it needs to be registered somewhere central.

But perhaps more than anything else, the real reason is cultural attitude towards backwards compatibility: Microsoft has built a strategy on trying to keep things working. That means new software needs smarts to know where to put stuff (c:\winnt becomes c:\windows, etc). Apple's more out with the old, in with the new - it gives them the freedom to streamline things like deployment.

share|improve this answer
Another reason for installing is to register an uninstaller that can remove all traces of the program. Something has to clean up all the leftover files and registry entries scattered around the place when you remove the program; unfortunately a lot of Windows developers don't seem to grasp this concept. Of course some programs are completely self contained, with everything stored in a single folder that can be safely deleted. – Bob Apr 27 '12 at 9:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.