Sign up ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm about to move audio files off my laptop before reformatting so that I can move them back again once its complete.

A friend of mine believes that cutting/pasting will be quicker than copying/pasting because the system doesn't need to duplicate the files, only simply move them.

Is this true?

share|improve this question
You still have to actually write the data there, so why should copying be slower than moving? – slhck Jun 9 '12 at 15:03
Actually moving will take few milliseconds longer - because file system metadata on origin drive would need to be updated. :) – Josip Medved Jun 9 '12 at 15:41
I don't think you want to be cutting without pasting if you want to keep the data.... – ck. Jun 9 '12 at 16:33
@ck That was a typo. I've edited the question. – Curt Jun 11 '12 at 8:13
Ask him if he thinks writing out an entire page of text is faster than writing out an entire page of text, then throwing the original away. – Dracs Jun 11 '12 at 8:17

1 Answer 1

up vote 9 down vote accepted

The files still need to be moved onto the drive, thus a copy still needs to be made; bit for bit. There should not be any significant changes. (If it was moving a file from the 2 locations on the same disk, cutting would take less time as it only has to re-write the location of the file and not the file itself.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.