Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I will be designing an instrument panel for a vehicle to display the common gauges that you would find in a car - (speedometer, rpm, fuel level, oil pressure, etc.). We have selected a 7" LCD and are in the process of narrowing down the hardware (This will use an ARM processor). The idea is to read these values off of the CAN Bus and update the UI with those values. This needs to have a fairly quick boot time, 5-10 seconds would be acceptable from the time the ignigtion is turned on to the time the UI is running. I have been doing a lot of research on which linux distribution to use, but I wanted to ask the question here to get the community's suggestions. I have been a .NET programmer for years, so linux is a new world to me. Here is what I have found so far...

Tizen is geared for In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) (plus some others). However, this project is not an IVI, and I do not need the phone dialer, navigation, etc.

Meego is dead, and Tizen seems to be the replacement

Angstrom, Debian... would either of these be useful? I am not tied to a particular programming language or IDE. Any help and direction is appreciated!

share|improve this question
You could open a dialog with the Tizen people, to see if they are interested in working with you to develop the distro you need. – Bon Gart Jun 12 '12 at 15:27
up vote 0 down vote accepted

You probably do not want to use a Linux distribution intended for a PC desktop or laptop or tablet for an embedded system. For embedded devices, the Linux kernel is often built (configured and cross-compiled) from scratch, although the Buildroot script makes that task quite easy. Besides customizing the kernel to the exact requirements of the hardware and the application, you can specify non-standard schedulers and memory allocation schemes. For conservation of main and flash (storage) memory, embedded system typically use the unified BusyBox instead of assorted binaries for commands and replace the huge GNU libC with the compact uClibc.

BTW the Tizen and Meego projects seem seem to be way beyond what you need, unless I'm underestimating your design. Those projects are for interactive panels, whereas I'm guessing you are building a visual panel to display sensor data that has minimal user inputs. Isn't your project in the instrumentation category?

This will use an ARM processor

That covers a rather broad spectrum of capability. I'm guessing that you'll end up with an ARMv9 SoC. But if cost is a severe constraint, then an ARM Cortex-Xx (ARMv7 based) with a simpler RTOS (i.e. no MMU) might suffice.

This needs to have a fairly quick boot time, 5-10 seconds

Linux will require some work to achieve a short boot time (e.g. quiet boot option). But I've only read of boot (U-Boot + Linux) times lowered to the 12-15 seconds range. You should quickly decide on a tentative chip, and then obtain an evaluation board to test out some design concepts on this prototype.

share|improve this answer
You are correct in stating that this project is in the instrumentation category. There will be some user input from a scrollwheel, but nothing major. Price is not a big concern... $200-$250 would be ok for just the SoC. I have been looking at the BeagleBoard and BeagleBone due to the large community and ease of use. So do you suggest building the kernel and then adding required libraries (SocketCAN and others)? This is over my head right now... – Brent Jun 13 '12 at 2:37
The last time I heard that "price is not a big concern" was a DoD cost-plus project. You mean $200 per board? These SoCs tend to be priced under $5 in quantity. Are you thinking of using off-the-shelf HW in place of custom boards for production? Beware of non-industrial rated components if you expect operation in harsh environment. Most eval boards have a get-started or demo kernel, but everyone eventually builds a custom kernel. The CAN bus driver is part of the kernel, and is trivial to configure. If cost really isn't an issue, then there's also MS Windows CE. – sawdust Jun 13 '12 at 8:04
Sorry, I'm talking about prototype cost. We would definitly want to be in the $5-$10 range for production. You definitly gave me something to think about... I can see that I just need to dive in and start trying things out on my own. I hope you were kidding about Windows CE... ;) – Brent Jun 13 '12 at 12:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.