Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

On a old machine (512 MB RAM) I am currently running ubuntu jaunty and firefox 3.0.15. I tried the ad blocker addon add block plus but it eats lots of RAM (>300 MB).

  • Is high memory load of this add-on a bug, which is fixed in a newer version or just normal? If so, why is the memory usage so high?

  • Is there another ad blocker add-on for firefox, another browser- add-on combination for linux (ubuntu jaunty) or even better a browser independent solution for linux which uses significant less RAM?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, Canadian Luke, soandos, iglvzx, Simon Sheehan Jul 15 '12 at 2:23

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
Please could you explain me why this question was closed? –  student Aug 11 '12 at 19:18

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

ABP acknowledges on their forum that they have a significant memory overhead, so if you want to get your RAM usage down you will have to switch to something else.

You could always try an ad-blocking HOSTS file, which wouldn't waste RAM. This particular one is regularly updated, but be sure to check it over before adopting it and make a backup of your original to be safe, of course. Lifehacker also has a whole article on this subject.

share|improve this answer
    
Can you provide a reference/link for the acknowledgement made by the ABP folks? –  Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 Jun 16 '12 at 16:37
    
Further looking into the ABP forums shows a lot of performance optimization threads where IT-savvy folk have got their memory consumption cut down quite a bit. There is a lot of talk about this, the best "acknowledgment" I can find is here: adblockplus.org/forum/… –  Paul Jun 16 '12 at 17:49
    
@techie007 You can also look into the mercurial logs to see the comments on what the Dev has recently changed and updated. So I recommend everyone makes sure they have an up-to-date plugin to get these fixes in too. –  Paul Jun 16 '12 at 17:50

On can also use privoxy or Bfilter. For privoxy there is a script which converts adblock+ lists for privoxy, see: http://andrwe.org/scripting/bash/privoxy-blocklist, same for Bfilter: http://www.convoglio.com/bfilter/

share|improve this answer

Check out dnsmasq

Example:

/etc/dnsmasq.d/malware.list<
address=/googlesyndication.com/0.0.0.0

blocks the ads for googlesyndication.com in every browser and app.

share|improve this answer
    
Not sure why this was down voted... –  Kyle Jun 16 '12 at 16:44
    
This method can be applied in modified router firmware such as DD-WRT, but could adding many of those slow down the router? –  superuser Jun 16 '12 at 17:31

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.