Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I recently have been getting a lot of system lag here (for example, the mouse and the display in general take about 15 seconds to react in the worst cases).
After a lot of monitoring the resources, I found that the problem mainly happens when too much Disk I/O is being done.

Three culprits have been identified:

  • My browser had the highest write I/O with 35,000,000 I/O Write Bytes.
  • Steam had the highest read I/O (when IDLE!!!) with 106,000,000 I/O Read Bytes.
  • My antivirus (in both cases I will soon mention) was the runner up in both cases with: 30,000,000ish write and 80,000,000ish read.

The first AV I had was Avast! which I had liked on my previous system. After noticing it taking so much I/O I switched to Panda (supposing it wouldn't use TOO much during idle phase). However it only used a bit less I/O. Just a lot less memory and cpu and somewhat more network.

My browser at the moment is Maxthon 3 (which I like a lot). Before this I was running chrome which had similar data and much higher cpu when running in the background was enabled.

I'm not going to be running steam all the time and there aren't many alternatives to it.
I like my browser very much, but I AM willing to switch if there's an obvious problem (I'm in programming, however I'm not a very good sysadmin, especially not when it comes to windows).
Finally, my system almost stops lagging when I turn off the antivirus (and preferably steam) (some remains but once in every 5-6 hours for a few seconds so it isn't a big problem).

My question (has a few parts):

  • Is it possible to configure steam to lower it's I/O usage? (and maybe network while we're at it?)
  • Which antivirus (very preferably free) uses lowest I/O while idle (I leave PC alone during active scans so that isn't a problem).
  • Is there an obvious problem with my current browser and, if so, is there a way to fix it or should I switch and, if so, to what? (P.S. I've been on FFox for some time too).

Info on system:
Windows 7 (32 bit T_T, I am getting a new one in a few months but I want to keep using system during that time though).
Hard Drive (main) is a Raid0. (Also have an external 1TB one which contains steam (and steam alone). As such it doesn't get used by much anything other than steam and isn't a very large problem. However steam still uses some I/O of registry)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600@2.4GHz
RAM: 6GB (3.25GB usable) (this and CPU have little effect as shown in next section)

Additional info:
Memory usage during problematic times: 44%
CPU usage during problematic times: 35%
Page File: main drive: system managed. 1TB drive: none.
The current system I'm using is about 6 years old and is mainly a place holder while I await the new one in a few months.

Final words: this is my 1st post on Super User (this question wouldn't feel right on Stack Overflow where I usually stay). If it doesn't have it's place here please tell me. If anything is wrong with it, same.

Technically I'm looking for a live thread detection program with minimal IO usage. I already have good active scan capability: Kaspersky (the free scanner uses the paid database) and MalwareBytes.

Edit 2

Noticed another one, it seems that windows media player has been using stuff even when off! Turning it off and restarting now. If the problem is fixed I'll tell you guys. The reason I didn't notice it before was because I didn't have resource manager in front of me at the MOMENT of the problem. Now I did and it was at the very top of the list!

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, Mokubai, Renan, Journeyman Geek, Nifle Jul 13 '12 at 7:49

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Please post the specifications of your PC, namely CPU, RAM, hard drive and so on, to give us a better idea of what you're working on. As an aside, I'm a fan of ESET NOD32 AntiVirus. – user3463 Jun 22 '12 at 0:48
@RandolphWest Posted CPU and RAM info. Showing hard drive involves taking it out (which I'm too tired to do today) because it's a raid0 (NVIDIA strip). However from system stats the rest of the info you ask for (CPU, RAM, etc) should be meaningless (see Additional Info section with usage %). – SpaceToast Jun 22 '12 at 0:54
Technically I'm looking for a live thread detection program with minimal IO usage. I already have good active scan capability: Kaspersky (the free scanner uses the paid database) and MalwareBytes. – SpaceToast Jun 22 '12 at 1:00
@ekaj Task Manager and Resource Monitor (built in windows features). Both of them had same results. – SpaceToast Jun 22 '12 at 1:18
Note* Came across Comodo Firewall+AV. It appears to have satisfactory live protection. However I could find no info on HDD usage. Anyone know how high it is? – SpaceToast Jun 22 '12 at 1:19
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I would probably say Microsoft Security Essentials. According to third-party tests, it won't detect as many threats as Avast!, but is one of the AV programs most touted for its lightness and lack of using many system resources while idle.

share|improve this answer
Yeah I was gonna try it right now (after about a few hours of research). I'm still looking further though. Also, any known problems with Maxthon? I find it kinda weird for a BROWSER to write/read that much data even when idle! – SpaceToast Jun 22 '12 at 0:55
Another thing with it, since I'm mainly using it as a live detection tool, I've also seen that it supposedly has a MUCH lower detection rate than anything else (and badly compares in scanning). Now if the live detection is much worse that may be a problem. – SpaceToast Jun 22 '12 at 1:06
Well, I've never used either Microsoft Security Essentials OR Maxathon, that's just what I've heard. I use Chrome, but I don't really worry about its memory usage or cpu usage either. – brunston Jun 22 '12 at 1:27
it's not about memory usage, nor cpu. If you read my entire post the main problem is in I/O write/read bytes. This is actually the most common reason for lag since I/O is 2000 times slower than RAM. (think F-12 raptor vs slug) – SpaceToast Jun 22 '12 at 1:31
Oh. sorry for confusion. I can't help you then. my expertise isn't that advanced. – brunston Jun 22 '12 at 1:32

You may also want to consider using Webroot's various AV products. It isn't free, but it has a VERY small footprint and scans are extremely fast. I've seen rave reviews from various places on the net about them, so it would defiantly be worth checking out.

I actually swapped to them before getting a Mac :)

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .